search for: bh_protect

...*(int *)0 = 0; } 2) include/linux/fs.h Can I still just increase by one from BH_Temp on as advised here https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-April/000448.html ===== ext3 patch --- 197,221 ---- #define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */ #define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */ #define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */ #define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */ #define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */ + #define BH_Temp 8 /* 1 if the buffer is...

...e raid patch that Red Hat includes in their kernel but that patch includes the following hunk: --- linux/include/linux/fs.h.orig Tue Jan 16 13:30:09 2001 +++ linux/include/linux/fs.h Tue Jan 16 13:47:18 2001 @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ #define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */ #define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */ #define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */ +#define BH_LowPrio 8 /* 1 if the buffer is lowprio */ /* * Try to keep the most commonly used fields in single cache lines (16 ext3 0.0.6b has the following hunk in it: --- linux-2.2....

...tate)); return; } printk("VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer\n"); + J_ASSERT(buf->b_count > 0); *(int *)0 = 0; <== This is RH specific, I chose to put J_ASSERT before it } 2) +1 to all added stuff include/linux/fs.h @@ -192,6 +192,25 @@ #define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */ #define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */ #define BH_LowPrio 8 /* 1 if the buffer is lowprio */ +#define BH_Temp 9 /* 1 if the buffer is temporary (unlinked) */ +#define BH_JWrite 10 /* 1 if being written to log (@@...