search for: bgunter

It is in the doBy package. Thanks From: Bert Gunter [mailto:bgunter.4567 at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:32 PM To: Pius Mwansa <pmwansa at shaw.ca> Cc: R-help <r-help at r-project.org> Subject: Re: [R] LSmeans and lsmeans Always cc the list unless there is good reason to keep your reply private. There is no LSmeans() function in t...

...take of the assignment was to avoid 'parse' specifically. we start with a character vector, so avoiding characters is not possible. i was dealing with the fortune "if parse is the answer, you have the wrong question" Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2025, at 15:39, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: ? Thanks, Rich. I thought of that, too, but it violates the spirit of my restraints (to avoid character strings), which I unfortunately did not clearly articulate. So my apologies for that failure. My concern is that with more complex model formula, using as.formula,...

...and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Pius Mwansa <pmwansa at shaw.ca> wrote: > It is in the doBy package. > > > > Thanks > > > > *From:* Bert Gunter [mailto:bgunter.4567 at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:32 PM > > *To:* Pius Mwansa <pmwansa at shaw.ca> > *Cc:* R-help <r-help at r-project.org> > *Subject:* Re: [R] LSmeans and lsmeans > > > > Always cc the list unless there is good reason to keep your rep...

...I see no way of processing that within the current modeling system without generating a formula (a string) that gets parsed. -----Original Message----- From: R-help <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> On Behalf Of Richard M. Heiberger Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2025 8:47 PM To: Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> Cc: R-help <R-help at r-project.org> Subject: Re: [R] [External] Creating model formulas programmatically [External Email] my take of the assignment was to avoid 'parse' specifically. we start with a character vector, so avoiding characters is not possible. i w...

...need to convert back: ?as.hexmode -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > ?strtoi > > You'll have to remove the "#" first, e.g. via substring() > > -- Bert > > > Bert Gunter > > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along > and sticking things into it." >...

...- "foo" can be piped as: z <- z |>(\(x) "names<-"(x,value = "[<-"(names(x),2,'foo')))() > z a foo 1 1 a 2 2 b 3 3 c This is even awfuller than before. So my query still stands. -- Bert On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 1:14?PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Nope, I still got it wrong: None of my approaches work. :( > > So my query remains: how to do it via piping with |> ? > > Bert > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 1:06?PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > &g...

...255 blue 0 64 0 > rgb2hsv(col2rgb(myColors)) One Two Three h 0.08104575 0.3891798 0.1666667 s 1.00000000 1.0000000 1.0000000 v 1.00000000 0.7490196 1.0000000 Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > ... and if you need to convert back: ?as.hexmode > > > -- Bert > > > Bert Gunter > > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along > and sticking things into it." > -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in...

...ithin the current modeling system without generating a > formula (a string) that gets parsed. > > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> On Behalf Of Richard M. > Heiberger > Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2025 8:47 PM > To: Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> > Cc: R-help <R-help at r-project.org> > Subject: Re: [R] [External] Creating model formulas programmatically > > [External Email] > > my take of the assignment was to avoid 'parse' specifically. > we start with a character vector, so avoidin...

It should be written more like this: ```R z <- data.frame(a = 1:3, b = letters[1:3]) z |> names() |> _[2] <- "foo" z ``` Regards, Iris On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 4:47?PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > With further fooling around, I realized that explicitly assigning my > last "solution" 'works'; i.e. > > names(z)[2] <- "foo" > > can be piped as: > > z <- z |>(\(x) "names<-"(x,value = &q...

...sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Pius Mwansa <pmwansa at shaw.ca> wrote: > They are in the lsmeans package. > > > > Pius > > > > *From:* Bert Gunter [mailto:bgunter.4567 at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:16 PM > *To:* Pius Mwansa <pmwansa at shaw.ca> > *Cc:* R-help <r-help at r-project.org> > *Subject:* Re: [R] LSmeans and lsmeans > > > > In what packages? > > -- Bert > > > Bert Gunter >...

...t; somenames <- c("Heigh", "Ho", "Silver", "Away") > > as.formula(paste("~(",paste(somenames, collapse="+"),")^2")) > ~(Heigh + Ho + Silver + Away)^2 > > > > > On Mar 29, 2025, at 14:30, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > somenames <- c("Heigh", "Ho", "Silver", "Away") > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...an example. The values I have are 0 , 1, 2 . Tabulate () function seem to ignore calculating the frequency of 0 values and this is my exact problem as the frequency of 0 values should also be calculated for the maf to be calculated correctly. ________________________________ From: Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> Sent: 09 November 2017 23:51:35 To: Allaisone 1; R-help Subject: Re: [R] Calculating frequencies of multiple values in 200 colomns [[elided Hotmail spam]] "For example, if I have the values : 1 , 2 , 3 in each column, applying Tabulate () would calculate the frequency o...

If you object to names(x)[2]<- ... then use replace: z |> list(x = _) |> within(replace(names(x), 2, "foo")) |> _$x On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 11:10?AM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > hmmm... > But note that you still used the nested assignment, names()[2] <- > "foo", to circumvent R's pipe limitations, which is exactly what > Iris's solution avoids. So I think I was overawed by your cleverness > ;-) > &g...

...mail.com>?s solution was able to achieve that. Nonetheless, we do appreciate your solution. Regards ------------------ Kevin Wamae From: William Dunlap <wdunlap at tibco.com> Date: Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 20:21 To: Kevin Wamae <KWamae at kemri-wellcome.org> Cc: Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com>, Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt>, R-help <R-help at r-project.org> Subject: Re: [R] Populate one data frame with values from another dataframe for rows that match Your example used one distinct studyno in DF1 and one distinct pf_mcl in DF2. I think that ma...

...ght the rules somehow on the collection of trees and give > a probability. But if that doesnt make sense, then can you just tell me > how to get the decsion rules with one tree and I will work from that. > > Mike > > Mike > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think you are missing the point of random forests. But if you just >> want to predict using the forest, there is a predict() method that you >> can use. Other than that, I certainly don't understand what you mean. >> Maybe someone e...

...thout 3 . I > need a way to calculate the frequencies of all of the 3 values so the > calculation of maf will be correct as it will consider all the 3 > frequencies but not only 2 . > > > Regards > > Allahisone > ------------------------------ > *From:* Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> > *Sent:* 09 November 2017 20:56:39 > *To:* Allaisone 1 > *Cc:* r-help at R-project.org > *Subject:* Re: [R] Calculating frequencies of multiple values in 200 > colomns > > This is not a good way to do things! R has many powerful built in > functions to...

hmmm... But note that you still used the nested assignment, names()[2] <- "foo", to circumvent R's pipe limitations, which is exactly what Iris's solution avoids. So I think I was overawed by your cleverness ;-) Best, Bert On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 8:01?AM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Wow! > Yes, this is very clever -- way too clever for me -- and meets my > criteria for a solution. > > I think it's also another piece of evidence of why piping in base R is > not suited for complex/nested assignments, as discussed in Deepa...

...e values I have are 0 , 1, 2 . Tabulate () function seem to ignore calculating the frequency of 0 values and this is my exact problem as the frequency of 0 values should also be calculated for the maf to be calculated correctly. > > ________________________________ > From: Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> > Sent: 09 November 2017 23:51:35 > To: Allaisone 1; R-help > Subject: Re: [R] Calculating frequencies of multiple values in 200 colomns > > [[elided Hotmail spam]] > > "For example, if I have the values : 1 , 2 , 3 in each column, applying Tabulate...

...39;m getting another cup of coffee... -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > NO NO -- I am wrong! The paste() expression is of course evaluated. > It's just that a character string is returned of the form "something - > something". > > I apologize for the confusion. > > -- Bert > > > > > Bert...

...sion and then unboxing it. > > z <- data.frame(a = 1:3, b = letters[1:3]) > z |> list(x = _) |> within(names(x)[2] <- "foo") |> _$x > ## a foo > ## 1 1 a > ## 2 2 b > ## 3 3 c > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 4:07?PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This post is likely pretty useless; it is motivated by a recent post > > from "Val" that was elegantly answered using Tidyverse constructs, but > > I wondered how to do it using base R only. Along the way, I ran into > >...