Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "bgh".
Did you mean:
bg
2008 Oct 25
1
Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
...50/hour for time sharing :-).
>
> I'm surprised that the bug lasted very long, or did it just go
> unreported? ;)
>
> > Are you retired Air Farce? A fair number of Burroughs field engineers had
> > learned the Burroughs equipment in the AF (and could afford to work at BGH
> > low pay because of their retirement pay).
>
> No, I was just young and foolish. Then someone explained that Burroughs
> wanted to get their techs hired away by the customers. They'd most
> likely continue to support Burroughs equipment, but on someone else's
> ni...
2014 May 02
2
[LLVMdev] MIPS n64 ABI and non-PIC
Actually, GCC will generate non-PIC for n64. Maybe that is a recent
addition, but we are using its results. Even if PIC may be faster and
smaller code, it seems that non-PIC is still useful for bare-metal. That's
the driver of my interest. I guess we can just test what happens when that
part of the conditional is removed. As a side note, if it isn't supported
then we should probably
2015 Oct 23
3
RFC: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:10:40AM -0700, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Let's start with: In just about every country in the world, anyone
> > contributing on behalf of their company are exercising their employers
> > copyright (in most cases, even if they do it in
2014 Apr 29
2
[LLVMdev] MIPS n64 ABI and non-PIC
Has anyone experimented with generating non-PIC for MIPS64 and the n64 ABI?
Currently MipsISelLowering.cpp uses conditions like:
if ((getTargetMachine().getRelocationModel() == Reloc::PIC_) || IsN64) {
}
around any PIC code generation. Is generating non-PIC just untested, or is
it known not to work? I can't find any discussion of it anywhere. I ran
into this when trying to see why