search for: bfilecheck

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "bfilecheck".

Did you mean: filecheck
2017 Jul 07
2
Swallowing of input in FileCheck
...k failures is easy, you just copy-paste the command like you said and pipe it to less. It's only a pain when you aren't sure if a failure on a bot will reproduce locally. So, I would be in favor of an option to lit that we enable on buildslaves that dumps the output. We already have a '\bFileCheck\b' substitution in lit. We'd just expand it to 'FileCheck --dump-on-failure' or something on bots. This sounds reasonable to me, no matter what on the above question. - Daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.o...
2017 Jul 07
2
Swallowing of input in FileCheck
Hi, Debugging tests which make use of FileCheck can be a frustrating experience, as all input will be swallowed (even with -v flag passed to lit), and one would often need to copy-and-paste and rerun the failing command manually without piping into FileCheck. Initially I’ve assumed that this is done due to stream processing, but looking at FileCheck source code I can see that it actually gets the
2017 Jul 08
3
Swallowing of input in FileCheck
...> you just copy-paste the command like you said and pipe it to less. It's > only a pain when you aren't sure if a failure on a bot will reproduce > locally. So, I would be in favor of an option to lit that we enable on > buildslaves that dumps the output. We already have a '\bFileCheck\b' > substitution in lit. We'd just expand it to 'FileCheck --dump-on-failure' > or something on bots. > > > This sounds reasonable to me, no matter what on the above question. > > - Daniel > > > _______________________________________________ > LLV...
2017 Jul 08
2
Swallowing of input in FileCheck
...t copy-paste the command like you said and pipe it to less. It's >> only a pain when you aren't sure if a failure on a bot will reproduce >> locally. So, I would be in favor of an option to lit that we enable on >> buildslaves that dumps the output. We already have a '\bFileCheck\b' >> substitution in lit. We'd just expand it to 'FileCheck --dump-on-failure' >> or something on bots. >> >> >> This sounds reasonable to me, no matter what on the above question. >> >> - Daniel >> >> >> ________________...