search for: bffa6fa7b8e5

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bffa6fa7b8e5".

2019 Sep 27
0
[RFC PATCH 13/13] vsock: fix bind() behaviour taking care of CID
...cket bound to the same port, but with different CID. Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> --- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index 750b62711b01..bffa6fa7b8e5 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -230,10 +230,16 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr) { struct vsock_sock *vsk; - list_for_each_entry(vsk, vsock_bound_sockets(addr), bound_table) - if (addr->svm_port == vsk->lo...
2019 Sep 27
29
[RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using
2019 Sep 27
29
[RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using