search for: bfe6

i86_64 CentOS-6.5 Samba-4.1.4-7 (sernet) MS-Win2000 Advanced Server AD DC I am following the HowTo provided at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC. I am at this point: ---> In this case, 737506d0-bfe6-40c8-815d-08c3dff7a67f is the objectGUID of the new DC, we'll query with the following command: # host -t CNAME 737506d0-bfe6-40c8-815d-08c3dff7a67f._msdcs.samdom.example.com. This should output you the alias (CNAME) of this entry pointing to your new DC name. If this record is also m...

...! Samba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Si...

I have Samba4 running, and it had a win2k3 server joined to it. This is working great. I'd like to add another Ubuntu 12.04 server with samba4 beta5. What's the best join method? Do I provision the server as a member, then join using samba-tools domain join <domain> When I do it looks like it doesn't replicate the directory, just forwards? Should I provision as a DC with

...! Samba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Si...

...! Samba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Si...

...tination Host Unreachable It like the virtual instance is there, and then gone. Here is the output of ifconfig on the dom0: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:DD:BF:E6 inet addr:192.168.0.15 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fedd:bfe6/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:100938 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:105438 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:22554988 (21.5 MiB) TX bytes:3616...

...! Samba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Si...

...! Samba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Si...

...! Samba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Si...

...634 IP 192.168.56.32.389 > 192.168.56.33.49418: Flags [S.], seq 1871167462, ack 1115242951, win 28960, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 5433953 ecr 5433953,nop,wscale 7], length 0 0x0000: 4500 003c 0000 4000 4006 492a c0a8 3820 E..<.. at .@.I*..8. 0x0010: c0a8 3821 0185 c10a 6f87 bfe6 4279 41c7 ..8!....o...ByA. 0x0020: a012 7120 f1c0 0000 0204 05b4 0402 080a ..q............. 0x0030: 0052 ea61 0052 ea61 0103 0307 .R.a.R.a.... 16:37:05.449657 IP 192.168.56.33.49418 > 192.168.56.32.389: Flags [.], ack 1, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 5433954 ecr 5433953], length...

Hey Richard, Could you share the following informations please? 1. gluster volume info <volname> 2. getfattr output of that file from all the bricks getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brickpath/filepath> 3. glustershd & glfsheal logs Regards, Karthik On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > On a side note, try recently released health

On a side note, try recently released health report tool, and see if it does diagnose any issues in setup. Currently you may have to run it in all the three machines. On 26-Oct-2017 6:50 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for this report. This week many of the developers are at Gluster > Summit in Prague, will be checking this and respond next

...ommon.c:1327:afr_log_selfheal] 0-home-replicate-0: Completed data selfheal on 7944168f-beaf-446b-a13f-7e81516a575c. sources=0 [2] sinks=1 [2017-10-25 10:40:30.906212] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-common.c:1327:afr_log_selfheal] 0-home-replicate-0: Completed data selfheal on a3641caa-a670-4539-bfe6-708dddf97faa. sources=0 [2] sinks=1 [2017-10-25 10:40:30.908845] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-metadata.c:52:__afr_selfheal_metadata_do] 0-home-replicate-0: performing metadata selfheal on 68bf646e-0909-4a9e-8eb8-d27bd299cbc8 [2017-10-25 10:40:30.911495] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-common...