search for: bf016e5f

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "bf016e5f".

2017 Sep 03
0
Why are LLVM releases statically linked against LLVM libraries?
On 3 Sep 2017, at 02:41, Will Dietz via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I can speculate the reasons from a technical standpoint and by > inferring from commit history... > but curious if there's a better answer to be had? There’s a fairly noticeably performance improvement from static linking. I think last time I benchmarked it, building FreeBSD with
2017 Sep 03
2
Why are LLVM releases statically linked against LLVM libraries?
Sincere question! I'm not at all suggesting this is the wrong choice or asking it to be defended, just explained :) Simply curious if anyone can speak as to the reasons for this and perhaps give a sense of how strong these reasons are or if they're just the tie-breaking reasons we came up with because hosting /both/ seemed silly :P. (or whatever the case may be) I'll note the build