Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "bf016e5f".
2017 Sep 03
0
Why are LLVM releases statically linked against LLVM libraries?
On 3 Sep 2017, at 02:41, Will Dietz via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I can speculate the reasons from a technical standpoint and by
> inferring from commit history...
> but curious if there's a better answer to be had?
There’s a fairly noticeably performance improvement from static linking. I think last time I benchmarked it, building FreeBSD with
2017 Sep 03
2
Why are LLVM releases statically linked against LLVM libraries?
Sincere question!
I'm not at all suggesting this is the wrong choice or asking it to be
defended, just explained :)
Simply curious if anyone can speak as to the reasons for this
and perhaps give a sense of how strong these reasons are
or if they're just the tie-breaking reasons we came up with
because hosting /both/ seemed silly :P.
(or whatever the case may be)
I'll note the build