search for: bexpfull

...#39;m trying to compile the latest 3.0 and 3.2 versions without much success. I can't compile using the IBM compiler we have because it doesn't support C99 correctly and configure fails. Compiling smbd/ with gcc 2.95.2 or 3.3.4 succeeds, but the associated linker doesn't understand the -bexpfull or -bbigtoc targets and linking fails. If I comment these targets out in the Makefile, linking succeeds. I'm hoping someone could answer at least one of the following questions: 1. I don't understand the purpose of expfull or bigtoc. If I can compile/link without -bexpfull and -bbigtoc,...

...le-iprint \ --without-ldap \ --without-ads Here is what is being executed. 10:58:25 runner ['gcc', '-g', '-Wl,-blibpath:/opt/local/samba/lib:/usr/lib:/lib,-brtl,-bbigtoc', '-maix64', '-shared', '-Wl,-brtl,-bexpfull', 'source3/lib/cluster_support.c.44.o', 'source3/lib/ctdb_dummy.c.44.o', '-o/nimfs/sw/build/samba-4.11.6/bin/default/source3/libsamba-cluster-support-samba4.so', '-Wl,-bsvr4,-R,/nimfs/sw/build/samba-4.11.6/bin/shared', '-Wl,-bsvr4,-R,/nimfs/sw/build/samba-4.1...

On 10/23/2012 12:20 PM, Sunil Saggar wrote: > I was able to process further by making some code changes and replacing > export-dynamic with -bexpfull in Makefile.config. Now, i am getting > following error while linking .. > > llvm[3]: Linking Release+Asserts Loadable Module LLVMHello.so What exactly was the linking command? -Krzysztof -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundat...

I was able to process further by making some code changes and replacing export-dynamic with -bexpfull in Makefile.config. Now, i am getting following error while linking .. llvm[3]: Linking Release+Asserts Loadable Module LLVMHello.so ld: 0706-027 The -R $ORIGIN flag is ignored. ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: llvm::Pass::getPassName() const ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: llvm::Pass::...

Hi All, I am trying to build llvm on AIX. I installed all the required packages including gcc, g++, etc ./configure also went fine. but i tried to run gmake, i got the following error: llvm[1]: Compiling MemoryBuffer.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[1]: Compiling MemoryObject.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[1]: Compiling Mutex.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[1]: Compiling Path.cpp for

...: 1. ./configure --enable-targets=powerpc 2. gmake Apart from it, i had to make a few changes. i. dladdr code has been commented for the time being and using the default constructor code for that method ii. In Makefile.config, 2 changes were done. +153 # Linker flags. +154 LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-G,-bexpfull +211 # What to pass as -rdynamic flag to g++ +212 #RDYNAMIC := -Wl,-export-dynamic +213 RDYNAMIC := -Wl,-brtl It helped me to proceed lot further with the compilation but i am stuck at assembler error while compiling /usr/llvm/llvm-3.1.src/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCJITInfo.cpp file. It throw...

...works... no checking if -Wl,-z,ignore works... no checking if -z ignore works... no checking if -Wl,-z,defs works... no checking if -error_unresolved works... no checking if -Wl,-error_unresolved works... no checking LDSHFLAGS_Z_DEFS... checking LDFLAGS... -L./bin checking DYNEXP... -Wl,-brtl,-bexpfull,-bbigtoc checking SHLD... ${CC} ${CFLAGS} checking LDSHFLAGS... -Wl,-G,-bexpfull,-bbigtoc,-brtl checking SHLIBEXT... so checking SONAMEFLAG... # checking PICFLAG... -O2 checking NSSSONAMEVERSIONSUFFIX... checking whether building shared libraries actually works... yes checking used PICFLAG... -O2 c...