search for: beta4

...3. I''m running Ruby 1.9.2 (as instructed by the guide), installed using RVM. I get an error when following "4.3 Setting the Application Home Page". When making a request to http://localhost:3000/ , I get: lm@office:~/blog$ rails server => Booting WEBrick => Rails 3.0.0.beta4 application starting in development on http://0.0.0.0:3000 => Call with -d to detach => Ctrl-C to shutdown server [2010-06-17 17:40:09] INFO WEBrick 1.3.1 [2010-06-17 17:40:09] INFO ruby 1.9.2 (2010-05-31) [i686-linux] [2010-06-17 17:40:09] INFO WEBrick::HTTPServer#start: pid=15264 port=30...

...rating ==================================================== -- create_table(:users) rake aborted! An error has occurred, all later migrations canceled: undefined method `<=>'' for class `ActiveSupport::Multibyte::Chars'' c:/Ruby191/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/ active_support/multibyte/chars.rb:49:in `<class:Chars>'' c:/Ruby191/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/ active_support/multibyte/chars.rb:36:in `<module:Multibyte>'' c:/Ruby191/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/ active_suppor...

My app works fine in development on my laptop but in production on my server I get "We''re sorry, but something went wrong. We''ve been notified about this issue and we''ll take a look at it shortly." I am using Rails 3, Ruby 1.8.7, Apache and passenger 2.2.15 I get the welcome aboard page in production if I just go to the domain name but as soon as I want data

We've been doing our own beta testing of Dovecot 2.0-beta4 IMAP (both direct IMAP and webmail-fronted), and we've had nothing but glowing compliments from our beta users/victims. I've also been running a lone box with the latest mercurial build and that's been running just fine too. All mail data is on NFS, but I've put indexes on the local...

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz.sig This release fixes a memory corruption bug related to MODSEQ handling in earlier v1.2 releases. Memory corruption means that it's a security bug and possibly exploitable. MODSEQ code is new in v1.2, so v1.1 and older rele...

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz.sig This release fixes a memory corruption bug related to MODSEQ handling in earlier v1.2 releases. Memory corruption means that it's a security bug and possibly exploitable. MODSEQ code is new in v1.2, so v1.1 and older rele...

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz.sig Lots of fixes since beta3, but apparently there are still a few bugs left: - Is SORT working? - APPEND seems to have problems in some setups. - Still some SEARCH TEXT problems? Or Squat indexing problems? --------------...

I haven't had yet time to read all the mails in this list which I skipped in the last few of weeks. I'll try to get to them eventually. This release contains several new features which haven't been fully tested yet, such as ACLs, master users and Maildir++ quota. If you intend to use them, test them properly first. This is the first Dovecot release where it's supposed to work

I'm running: localhost(6.1-P)[21] uname -a FreeBSD localhost 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #19: Wed Mar 15 07:15:25 PST 2006 root@g1-18.catwhisker.org.:/common/S2/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP_30W i386 localhost(6.1-P)[22] I figured I'd grab a copy of the recent 6.1-BETA4 (disc1) ISO to try it out & hand it out to folks.... It seems to have worked, but I got a bit of a whine in the "fixate" stage: localhost(6.1-P)[12] ls -l 6.1-BETA4* -rw-r--r-- 1 david wheel 464979968 Mar 15 12:13 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc1.iso localhost(6.1-P)[13] grep BETA4 CHECKSUM....

...bundle install in my rails project. Now I am trying to run some tests... My test_helper.rb file looks like this: # test_helper.rb require ''rubygems'' require ''test/unit'' require ''rails/all'' $ gem list i18n (0.4.1, 0.3.7) activesupport (3.0.0.beta4, 3.0.0.beta3, 3.0.0.beta, 2.3.8) rails (3.0.0.beta4) railties (3.0.0.beta4) $ bundle install Using activesupport (3.0.0.beta4) from bundler gems Using builder (2.1.2) from bundler gems Using i18n (0.4.1) from bundler gems ... Using railties (3.0.0.beta4) from bundler gems Using rails (3.0.0.beta4...

Hi! I would like to share with you an interesting test result. I re-encoded a song 10 times (the 2. made from the 1., the 3. made from the 2.,... the 10. made from the 9.), with a beta4 (CVS 20010620) and with an RC2 (CVS 20010817) library version, 256 kbit/s mode, channel coupling disabled at RC2. The beta4 is very good at the 10. encoding too, but the RC2 has some interesting quality bugs. So, the songs: They are OGG files (not compressed zip), just rename them to OGG! 1. encod...

...alhost 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #19: > Wed Mar 15 07:15:25 PST 2006 > root@g1-18.catwhisker.org.:/common/S2/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP_30W i386 > > localhost(6.1-P)[22] > > > > I figured I'd grab a copy of the recent 6.1-BETA4 (disc1) > ISO to > > try it out & hand it out to folks.... > > > > It seems to have worked, but I got a bit of a whine in the > "fixate" > > stage: > > > > localhost(6.1-P)[12] ls...

I am unable to get 2.0.beta4 to compile. I get the following errors: /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-slackware-linux/4.3.3/../../../../lib64/libwrap.a(hosts_access.o): In function `host_match': hosts_access.c:(.text+0x625): undefined reference to `yp_get_default_domain' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [tcpwrap]...

When I try rails console using Rails3 beta4 and Ruby 1.9.1-p378 I cannot save a record: > rails console Loading development environment (Rails 3.0.0.beta4) ruby-1.9.1-p378 > g = Game.new => #<Game id: nil, player_id: nil, versus_id: nil, finished: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil> ruby-1.9.1-p378 > g.save NameError:...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1671 Summary: Openssh does not run with the openssl 1.0.0-beta4 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: jchadima at redh...

Hi, I tried to compile asterisk-1.8.0-beta4 but after ./configure && make I've got following error: [CC] res_fax.c -> res_fax.o [LD] res_fax.o -> res_fax.so [CC] res_fax_spandsp.c -> res_fax_spandsp.o res_fax_spandsp.c:117: error: field ?fax_state? has incomplete type res_fax_spandsp.c:118: error: field ?t38_st...

Does the 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso contain only usr/share/doc, or for some reason i am unable to see anything else? I was looking for usr/src (and for a odd chance to have usr/ports); i suppose those two trees would be available somewhere on some disc for RELENG_6_1. I mounted the image as ... mdconfig -a -t vno...

...er working with the xine multimedia player some time ago and posted a patch for anyone else to try. I really messed up when I did that since I generated the patch against some random CVS snapshot of xine-lib. I did better this time and generated the patch against the latest release of xine-lib (1.0-beta4, released today). If you would like to try this out: * go to http://xinehq.de * download xine-lib-1-beta4.tar.gz * unpack xine-lib: 'tar zxvf xine-lib-1-beta4.tar.gz' cd xine-lib-1-beta4 * download the decoder patch at: http://www.pcisys.net/~melanson/codecs/xine-1b4-vp3-dec...

Hello, I hope you won't mind if I give you mine opinion and suggestions about Vorbis audio encoder, especially new version. I was pretty satisfied with the quality of Beta4 encoder. For a bitrates around 112 to 128 kb/s I consider it better then any other audio compression formats (MP3, AAC, ...) at same bitrate. Sound quality that this version produces with bitrates below 112 kb/s was not satisfied me, so I look forward to any new version. I am sorry to say that RC2...

Hi all, Were there encoder differences between beta4 and 1.0rc1? A precompiled oggenc for Windows identifies itself as beta4, and from a certain mono file produces 53.3 kb/s files, whereas one I've compiled myself, identifying itself as 1.0rc1, produces 55.9 kb/s. Is this a feature or a bug? Also, all the links to images at the top of: http:/...