search for: beta10

Hi, I'm testing version 1.1.beta10 and getting these assertions on deliver: file index-transaction.c: line 54 (index_transaction_finish_rollback): assertion failed: (t->mail_ref_count == 0) This was after an upgrade from a 1.0 release candidate. If you need I can try and reproduce this in a more controled environment to pinpoin...

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta10.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta10.tar.gz.sig Changes since beta9: - dotlock_use_excl=yes is now the default. I think this should work in all NFS setups that are in use nowadays. O_EXCL has worked since NFSv3. - fs quota: Added "noenforcing" option - Fixed...

Hello, we have observed pop3 process which got stuck consuming all available CPU. It seems that it happened because of some kind of abnormal POP3 connection termination. Here is strace info for this process: 13:36:05.866190 writev(1, [{"508qWWH96If+uVXeH2Zxl/hkn+plVwmI"..., 3975}, {"HP1oxt+np0o4Xtz27VQBtxx0zWfGuA3r"..., 193}], 2) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe) 13:36:05.866250 ---

Hi Timo, Here is the backtrace for your reference. I have already applied dovecot-97702c9c4111 changes to my 1.1 beta10 code base. I am running dovecot on FC7, gcc 4.1.2, mailbox is on NFS. Whenever I did UID SEARCH body "xxxx" imap crashes. Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. #0 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) bt full #0 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall () No symbol table info availa...

Hello, when running diff for 'dovecot -n' outputs from beta10 and beta11(for the same config file), I noticed that 'dovecot -n' beta11 output does not show anymore the following parameters, which are set to non-default values(and which 'dovecot -a' shows): login_processes_count login_max_processes_count first_valid_uid first_valid_gid...

...e7, Number 3, Page 397-416. In order to give a clear statement of quesion I copy the following paragraph from the article: We compare the bridge model with the OLS, the lasso and the ridge in a simulation of a linear regression model of 30 observations and 10 regressors Y = beta0 + beta1*x1 + ... + beta10*x10 + epsilon, where epsilon follows a normal distribution with mean mu and standard deviation sigma. Ten regression matrices {X}m, m=1,...,10, are generated from an orthonormal matrix X of dimension 30*10 with different between-column pairwise correlation coefficients {rho}m generated from uniform...

We recently moved all our users from the Washington IMAP server to Dovecot. There has been a substantial improvement in performance, but some users are reporting duplicate messages, and we see 'Stale NFS file handle' errors in the syslog. Does anyone know what would cause this ? The errors relate to the index file, eg. Nov 29 00:49:47 imap-e.ucl.ac.uk dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error]

Hello In any project in rc4 i can''t load style in stylesheet_link_tag, and interested is that in html link tag too. All style don''t work. Have anybody this problem too ? Is a problem with current version or something other ? Michal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send

...hings left in my TODO are: - Squat indexes should handle expunges - Lucene indexes are broken - See if \recent flag handling could be fixed for maildir/mbox (it works for dbox though) - Some other minor things which I'll do if I have time, but won't block v1.1.0 release. Changes since beta10: - One major performance issue found and fixed. This was the main reason why we weren't yet in release candidate stage. - configure --with-package now gives an error if it can't find the necessary libs/headers for the package. Use --with-package=auto for the old behavior. - Memory leak...

I've read about one month back this list's messages. I've still 216 messages from this year marked as "unread" which I should look into more (+258 older ones). Also I've 180 "unread" messages in my INBOX also which might contain something useful. So those messages could still contain something that should be added to this list. Anyway looking at my current

I was able to get the source code for ocfs2 and compile it. This worked and created the necessary .ko files Now I have to figure out why gnu parted 1.6.15 has bugs. when I try a partprobe on a partitioned firewire maxtor drive mount -t ocfs2 /dev/sdb1 /u01/oradata/orcl It says no such device.... Any ideas anyone?... Regards, Mandar Vengurlekar ----- Original Message ----- From: Mandar P

...wed me the partitions I had created. > after this ..... > I installed gnu part 1.6.22 and the partprobe did not give any errors. > > Now however...here is where I am stuck,... > ====> > # mkfs.ocfs2 -b 4096 -C 4k -L /ocfs2/oradata/r10g/orcl -N 2 /dev/sdb1 > mkfs.ocfs2 0.99.9-BETA10 > Overwriting existing ocfs2 partition. > Proceed (y/N): y > Filesystem label=/ocfs2/oradata/r10g/orcl > Block size=4096 (bits=12) > Cluster size=4096 (bits=12) > Volume size=1011675136 (246991 clusters) (246991 blocks) > Journal size=16777216 > 8 cluster groups (tail covers...

...wed me the partitions I had created. > after this ..... > I installed gnu part 1.6.22 and the partprobe did not give any errors. > > Now however...here is where I am stuck,... > ====> > # mkfs.ocfs2 -b 4096 -C 4k -L /ocfs2/oradata/r10g/orcl -N 2 /dev/sdb1 > mkfs.ocfs2 0.99.9-BETA10 > Overwriting existing ocfs2 partition. > Proceed (y/N): y > Filesystem label=/ocfs2/oradata/r10g/orcl > Block size=4096 (bits=12) > Cluster size=4096 (bits=12) > Volume size=1011675136 (246991 clusters) (246991 blocks) > Journal size=16777216 > 8 cluster groups (tail covers...

We (Michael Fetterman, George Dunlap and I) have been working over the last while on a full replacement for Xen''s shadow pagetable support. This mail contains some design notes, below; a patch against xen-unstable, giving a snapshot of the current state of the new shadow code, is at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~tjd21/shadow2.patch Comments on both are welcome, although the code is not

...Received: from mailhost.comrad.co.nz (smtp.radiology.net.nz [210.54.249.27]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E744AB3 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 14:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from david (david.comrad.co.nz [192.168.42.31]) by mailhost.comrad.co.nz (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10) with SMTP id f78LeLeP021731 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 09:40:21 +1200 Reply-To: <davidm@comrad.co.nz> From: "David Milligan" <davidm@comrad.co.nz> Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org> Subject: RE: Disconnection of networkdrives Date: Thu...