Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "besttree".
2011 Dec 02
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...> &ConnectedPairs,
> + DenseSet<ValuePair> &PairableInstUsers,
> + DenseMap<Value *, Value *> &ChosenPairs,
> + DenseMap<ValuePair, size_t> &Tree, ValuePair J);
> +
> + void findBestTreeFor(
> + std::multimap<Value *, Value *> &CandidatePairs,
> + std::vector<Value *> &PairableInsts,
> + std::multimap<ValuePair, ValuePair> &ConnectedPairs,
> + DenseSet<...
2011 Dec 14
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...,
> > + DenseSet<ValuePair> &PairableInstUsers,
> > + DenseMap<Value *, Value *> &ChosenPairs,
> > + DenseMap<ValuePair, size_t> &Tree, ValuePair J);
> > +
> > + void findBestTreeFor(
> > + std::multimap<Value *, Value *> &CandidatePairs,
> > + std::vector<Value *> &PairableInsts,
> > + std::multimap<ValuePair, ValuePair> &ConnectedPairs,
> > +...
2011 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 21:22 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 11:55 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > Tobias,
> >
> > I've attached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many
> > (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments.
> >
> > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...,
> > + DenseSet<ValuePair> &PairableInstUsers,
> > + DenseMap<Value *, Value *> &ChosenPairs,
> > + DenseMap<ValuePair, size_t> &Tree, ValuePair J);
> > +
> > + void findBestTreeFor(
> > + std::multimap<Value *, Value *> &CandidatePairs,
> > + std::vector<Value *> &PairableInsts,
> > + std::multimap<ValuePair, ValuePair> &ConnectedPairs,
> > +...
2011 Nov 22
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 11:55 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote:
> Tobias,
>
> I've attached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many
> (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments.
>
> I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
> failure when compiling
>