Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "bestmatchidx".
2007 Apr 21
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Major regressions
...#39;s something else wrong with TargetData?
>
> Did you walk through it in the debugger?
Yes. It appears that TargetData doesn't have logic to match the case
of vector types smaller than the smallest defined ABI vector type.
It's asserting in TargetData::getAlignmentInfo:
assert(BestMatchIdx != -1 && "Didn't find alignment info for this
datatype!");
I don't think it has enough information to be able to determine
whether or not it's being asked for the alignment of a smaller vector
type that could be mapped onto a non-vector type.
My feeling is that...
2007 Apr 21
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Major regressions
...ta?
> >
> > Did you walk through it in the debugger?
>
> Yes. It appears that TargetData doesn't have logic to match the case
> of vector types smaller than the smallest defined ABI vector type.
> It's asserting in TargetData::getAlignmentInfo:
>
> assert(BestMatchIdx != -1 && "Didn't find alignment info for this
> datatype!");
That makes sense.
>
> I don't think it has enough information to be able to determine
> whether or not it's being asked for the alignment of a smaller vector
> type that could be mappe...