search for: berteaud

Le 13/11/2017 ? 21:07, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: > > Le 13/11/2017 ? 10:04, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: >> >> Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the >> .glusterfs directory) and reconnect ? >> > > In fact, what would be the difference between reconnecting the brick > with a wip...

...ster will discard its data and sync from the other, and not create a split brain situation) Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the .glusterfs directory) and reconnect ? I'd really like some help from GlusterFS experts here :-) Cheers, Daniel -- Logo FWS *Daniel Berteaud* FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Soci?t? de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 <tel:0556641532> Matrix: @dani:fws.fr /www.firewall-services.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachm...

Le 13/11/2017 ? 10:04, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: > > Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the .glusterfs > directory) and reconnect ? > In fact, what would be the difference between reconnecting the brick with a wiped FS, and using gluster volume remove-brick vmstore replica 1 master1:/mnt/bricks/vmsto...

On 11/15/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > > > > Le 13/11/2017 ? 21:07, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: >> >> Le 13/11/2017 ? 10:04, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: >>> >>> Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the >>> .glusterfs directory) and reconnect ? >>> >&...

...ad 10.5 > and 10.6 sections in the doc to get a better understanding of > replacing bricks. Thanks, I'll try that. Any way in this situation to check which file will be healed from which brick before reconnecting ? Using some getfattr tricks ? Regards, Daniel -- Logo FWS *Daniel Berteaud* FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Soci?t? de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 <tel:0556641532> Matrix: @dani:fws.fr /www.firewall-services.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachm...

Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 13:07 CET, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> a ?crit: > On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > > Any way in this situation to check which file will be healed from > > which brick before reconnecting ? Using some getfattr tricks ? > Yes, there are afr xattrs that determine the heal direction for each > file. The good copy will have non-zero trusted.afr* xattrs tha...

...you can upgrade > Samba ? 4.3.11 is EOL as far as Samba is concerned. I'd prefer keeping the version provided with the distro, but I'll check if there's some trustworthy PPA to get something a bit newer. The strange thing, is that the script is not even called at all. -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Visio: https://vroom.fws.fr/dani Web : http://www.firewall-services.com

On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > Le 15/11/2017 ? 09:45, Ravishankar N a ?crit?: >> If it is only the brick that is faulty on the bad node, but >> everything else is fine, like glusterd running, the node being a part >> of the trusted storage pool etc,? you could just kill the brick first >> a...

On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 09:53 +0100, Daniel Berteaud via samba wrote: > Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 09:35 CET, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> a écrit: > > > > This may have nothing to do with Samba, if you are running sssd, then > > this will be doing the authentication. > > sssd was providing the NSS ->...

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:20:03 +0100 Daniel Berteaud via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Now, the "funny" thing is that, it did work, something like 3 times > in over 50 tries. It's not just the config because, once it worked, I > removed the same workstation from the domain, removed the LDAP entry, > made...

On 11/17/2017 03:41 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 13:07 CET, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> a ?crit: > >> On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: >>> Any way in this situation to check which file will be healed from >>> which brick before reconnecting ? U...

...es the account doesn't already exist in LDAP, it tries to create it, which is failing (because my ACL in OpenLDAP does not allow it) See my logs attached Why doesn't samba execute my add machine script at this point, instead of trying to create it on its own ? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Visio: https://vroom.fws.fr/dani Web : http://www.firewall-services.com -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: add_user.txt URL: <http://lists.samba...

Am 23.09.13 16:00, schrieb Daniel Berteaud: > Le vendredi 20 septembre 2013 à 15:31 +0200, Thomas Stein a écrit : >> Hello. >> >> Is someone performing incremental backups via libvirt for qemu/kvm >> machines? I'm still having a hard time to >> find a nice procedure. I mean is it possible to make a ful...

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:58 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:51 +0100 > "Daniel Berteaud" <daniel at firewall-services.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for your response > > > > Le Mercredi, Novembre 15, 2017 17:38 CET, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> a écrit: > > > > > I suppose the obvious question is, is...

...'ide0-0-0'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' unit='0'/> </disk> Now I've noticed that this disk should probably have type "block" - using this is supposed to provide superior performance. It would also make Berteaud's virt-backup script happy and willing to snapshot the lvm making the backup very quick. So I tried setting up the disk like this: Code: <disk type='block' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <source dev='/dev/vg1/lvna...

Hello. Is someone performing incremental backups via libvirt for qemu/kvm machines? I'm still having a hard time to find a nice procedure. I mean is it possible to make a full backup of an image on monday a do the next days of the week incremental backups? Another way could be mount the image and rsync its contents. Does that makes sense? Also i read in qemu changelog: --- Support for a

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:25:11 +0100 Daniel Berteaud via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi. > > I'm running samba 3.6.3 (on Ubuntu 12.04). This server is acting as > an old style NT4 domain using samba as backend. Machine accounts are > created using a script, called by samba (add machine script). > Everything...

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:51 +0100 "Daniel Berteaud" <daniel at firewall-services.com> wrote: > Thanks for your response > > Le Mercredi, Novembre 15, 2017 17:38 CET, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> a écrit: > > > I suppose the obvious question is, is the script executable ? > >...

...once it worked, I removed the same workstation from the domain, removed the LDAP entry, made no configuration change, not service restart and tried again, without success. It might be related to some caching effect of sssd, I need to dig a bit deepper. Regards, Daniel -- Logo FWS *Daniel Berteaud* FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 <tel:0556641532> Matrix: @dani:fws.fr /www.firewall-services.com/

...nss-ldap+pam-ldap instead of sssd makes everything working. I just don't understand why. How can this makes samba ignore "add machine script" and instead try to create the entry directly ? Anyway, it's working now, even if I don't understand why Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Visio: https://vroom.fws.fr/dani Web : http://www.firewall-services.com