search for: bergner

On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 00:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:25:29 -0500 > Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > By the strict letter of the 32-bit ABI, the save and restore of > > r31 at a negative offset of r1 is verboten. The ABI states the > > the stack space below the stack pointer is declared as volatile. > > I actually debugged a simil...

...o achieve this without nasty workarounds like wrapper scripts monitoring the very-verbose output of SSH or doing DPI? Alternatively, would it be possible to add a config option, allowing an administrator to disable reverse port forwarding or limit it's destinations? Thank you in advance, Jan Bergner -- ________________________________________ *Jan Bergner, M.Sc. * Software Engineer ? *indurad GmbH* *The Industrial Radar Company* ? Belvedereallee 5 52070 Aachen, Germany Office: + 49 241 538070-61 Front Desk: + 49 241 538070-0 Fax: + 49 241 538070-99 jan.bergner at indurad.com www.indurad.com...

...this configuration works? Is this a good solution? i really don't know, so what's the global thinking about this. -- Information Systems Engineering GmbH Br?ndel?ckerstrasse 6 91207 Lauf an der Pegnitz Tel: +49-9123-9772-20 Mobil: +49-172-8254222 Fax: +49-9123-9772-22 Email: stefan.bergner@ise-informatik.de WWW: http://www.ise-informatik.de > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Lapin(c) [mailto:lapin@linagora.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 1. M?rz 2004 21:14 > An: Stefan Bergner > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] samba configuration multiple et...

On Tue, 01 May 2012 17:23:07 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 16:06 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > LLVM/clang now will build in the normal way (./configure; make > > install) on PPC (you'll need at least the 3.1 release candidate (or > > trunk)). I generally build on my PPC...

On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 19:58 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 17:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > By default it should build for > > whatever the current host is (no special flags required). To > > specifically build for something else, use: > > -ccc-host-triple powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu > >...

On 9/13/17 10:31 AM, Peter Bergner via llvm-dev wrote: > On 9/12/17 8:15 PM, Bill Seurer via llvm-dev wrote: >> I updated one of my powerpc64le llvm test systems to Fedora 25 and I >> started getting a whole bunch of sanitizer test case failures.  I tried >> testing some earlier revisions on the new OS that had...

Hello all, in order to connect to my SSH servers from untrusted devices like company computers or my smartphone, I set up 2FA with google-authenticator hooked into PAM. However, this is not really 2FA at least for the smartphone, since I use the same device for generating the TANs and it is also at least inconvenient to always require a new TAN for each connection. I do not want to solely rely

...Brian. Right now, I cannot simply use IPs. (However, it would not be out of reach to simply put all clients on a private VPN. But I would consider that more of a work-around to the original problem.) Thanks and best, Jan Am 22.10.20 um 01:31 schrieb Damien Miller: > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020, Jan Bergner wrote: > >> >> Hello all, >> >> in order to connect to my SSH servers from untrusted devices like company computers or my smartphone, I set up 2FA with >> google-authenticator hooked into PAM. >> >> However, this is not really 2FA at least for the smart...

On Apr 4 13:58, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Alexander Wuerstlein > <snalwuer at cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote: > > On 2018-04-04T17:27, mlrx <openssh-unix-dev at 18informatique.com> wrote: > >> Le 04/04/2018 ? 13:32, Jan Bergner a ?crit : > >> > Good day! > >> > > >> > Is it possible to achieve this without nasty workarounds like wrapper > >> > scripts monitoring the very-verbose output of SSH or doing DPI? > >> > Alternatively, would it be possible to add a confi...

On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:25:29 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 19:58 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 17:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > By default it should build for > > > whatever the current host is (no special flags required). To > > &...

...ic project so all the servers in this project can be sure to talk to another project server. Furthermore, I did not find out, how I would sign different hostkey- types. (Like RSA and ECDSA.) Is it possible to realize both? Thanks and best regards, Jan -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en Jan Bergner DevOps-Engineer | Corporate Information Management Arvato Supply Chain Solutions Gottlieb-Daimler-Str. 1 33428 Harsewinkel Deutschland Telefon: +49 (5241) 80 - 40354 jan.bergner at arvato.com<mailto:michael.nagel at bertelsmann.de> <http://www.arvato-supply-chain.com>http://w...

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:13 AM, Jan Bergner <jan.bergner at indurad.com> wrote: > Hello all. > > First of all, I want to extend my sincere thanks to all the people who > came to the rescue so quickly. > > In any case, there is obviously room for clarification on my part, so I > will try to describe the situation we...

...Lowering.cpp, is clang relying on that code, or is there some frontend code in clang itself that is failing to initially interpret the string? If it is the code in TargetLowering, then I don't see any support there for '*' or '#'. -Hal On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:33:58 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:54 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > There is a comment in the file which reads: > > > > /* The weird 'i#*X' constraints on the following suppress a gcc > > warning when __excepts is not a constant....

...floating-point register to hold the result of the mffs instruction, and then bit casts (and truncates?) the result into the unsigned long variable. Is this correct, and if so, is this a general gcc feature, or something PowerPC specific? Thanks again, Hal On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:33:58 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:54 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > There is a comment in the file which reads: > > > > /* The weird 'i#*X' constraints on the following suppress a gcc > > warning when __excepts is not a constant....

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:54 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > There is a comment in the file which reads: > > /* The weird 'i#*X' constraints on the following suppress a gcc > warning when __excepts is not a constant. Otherwise, they mean the > same as just plain 'i'. */ [sinp] > ("mtfsb0 %s0" : : "i#*X"(__builtin_ffs (__excepts))); [snip]

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:19:13 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 20:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in > > clang or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, > > generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/T...

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 20:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in clang > or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, > generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp, is clang > relying on that code, or is there some frontend code in clang itself > that is failing to initially interpret the string? If

Hello, I am not sure whether this is a clang issue, an LLVM issue, or both; but clang chokes when parsing expanded macros from the glibc /usr/include/bits/fenvinline.h with an error like: ./boost/math/tools/config.hpp:279:10: error: invalid input constraint 'i#*X' in asm feclearexcept(FE_ALL_EXCEPT); ^ /usr/include/bits/fenvinline.h:56:11: note: expanded from macro

On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:10:56 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 15:51 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > - There is no support for generating position-independent code > > > > on PPC32. (PIC on PPC64 now works well). Nevertheless, I have > > > > sometimes run i...

On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 17:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > By default it should build for > whatever the current host is (no special flags required). To > specifically build for something else, use: > -ccc-host-triple powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu > or > -ccc-host-triple powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu So LLVM isn't biarch capable? Meaning one LLVM compiler cannot generate both