search for: benpart

...smb.conf (included below) but I don't think the NTLM setting is the cause as I can use smbclient to successfully login as user simon and get the following log fragment: [2019/04/23 14:33:59.978465, 3] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_server.c:552(ntlmssp_server_preauth) Got user=[simon] domain=[BENPARTS] workstation=[SERVER] len1=24 len2=224 [2019/04/23 14:33:59.978554, 3] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:3868(lp_load_ex) lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters [2019/04/23 14:33:59.978656, 3] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:547(init_globals) . . . adding IPC service [2019/04/23 14:33:59.987819, 3] ../...

...ol = NT1 again. @Rowland your are mislead.. ;-) > > Ah, it is a PDC Hm, no its a stand alone, the member references in my option. > >> security = user << stand alone ? > >> domain logons = yes << member ? > >> guest account = benparts > >> # Allow users to map to guest: > >> map to guest = baduser Guest definitions? . I think best here is first choose the setup type. Or member or stand alone and change the setting to it. Members? Add the guest to the share not global. Stand alone, guest in gl...

I have been a bit divorced from Samba for a while and am stumped by a recently seen issue. My Samba server (V4.8.3) is Centos 7 and the remote clients are windoze boxes at the other end of a VPN (OpenVPN). At some point in "recent" history, access to shares on the Centos server started to fail with password failures. The reason seems to be associated with user mapping. (See log fragment

...e issue with my smb.conf. > The scenario is a Centos 7 Linux server with a bunch of LAN connected windows > 10 clients and several remote windows 10 clients which connect via VPN. > The server firewall accepts everything from the VPN. > The server and local clients are all in workgroup BENPARTS while the remote > clients are either stand-alone or in different workgroups/domains. > Local SMB access works as expected but remote access does not due to password > failures (as described in earlier log excerpts). > What should the domain-related entries in smb.conf be to support...

...may be more than one issue with my smb.conf. The scenario is a Centos 7 Linux server with a bunch of LAN connected windows 10 clients and several remote windows 10 clients which connect via VPN. The server firewall accepts everything from the VPN. The server and local clients are all in workgroup BENPARTS while the remote clients are either stand-alone or in different workgroups/domains. Local SMB access works as expected but remote access does not due to password failures (as described in earlier log excerpts). What should the domain-related entries in smb.conf be to support this scenario? Cheer...

...gt; The scenario is a Centos 7 Linux server with a bunch of LAN > connected windows > > 10 clients and several remote windows 10 clients which > connect via VPN. > > The server firewall accepts everything from the VPN. > > The server and local clients are all in workgroup BENPARTS > while the remote > > clients are either stand-alone or in different workgroups/domains. > > Local SMB access works as expected but remote access does > not due to password > > failures (as described in earlier log excerpts). > > What should the domain-related en...

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 25 april 2019 11:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] User mapping/login issue > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:24:36 +0200 > L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > > > Ps.