Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "benik".
Did you mean:
beni
2004 Aug 06
3
de-essing into speex?
...sed speexenc incorrectly please let me know.
the wav file was 2MB so i didn't want to include that, but simply use
lameenc etc to decode the mp3 file into wav if you want to do testing.
i hope to hear from you soon. i find this issue very interesting.
olav
> From: "Tony & Amanda Benik" <benikajal@mcihispeed.net>
> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:47:39 -0600
>
> Representative of Olav,
>
> >like if you say "someone said the sun is shining", there is a lot of
> >ess sounds, and these will sound "computer-ish" at vbr qualities below...
2004 Aug 06
0
de-essing into speex?
...>
> the wav file was 2MB so i didn't want to include that, but simply use
> lameenc etc to decode the mp3 file into wav if you want to do testing.
>
> i hope to hear from you soon. i find this issue very interesting.
>
> olav
>
> > From: "Tony & Amanda Benik" <benikajal@mcihispeed.net>
> > Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:47:39 -0600
> >
> > Representative of Olav,
> >
> > >like if you say "someone said the sun is shining", there is a lot of
> > >ess sounds, and these will sound "computer-is...
2004 Aug 06
2
de-essing into speex?
are there plans to add "de-essing" as part of the speexenc procedure,
to make it possible to use lower quality compression without getting
those horrible computer-like "ess" sounds in the finished result?
like if you say "someone said the sun is shining", there is a lot of
ess sounds, and these will sound "computer-ish" at vbr qualities below
9.
i know
2008 Jun 07
0
Process Request and dummy_result
I''ve only been working with backgroundrb a few days so I don''t know
much of the procedures involved with its development....
But I came across what I consider a glitch in the latest GIT version
of the source.
The file server/lib/metaworker.rb at line 247
result = "dummy_result" unless result
should be changed to::
result = "dummy_result" if result.nil?
2004 Aug 06
0
de-essing into speex?
...stuct the wrong secondary peak onto the frames. (I'm guessing)
The filter also will most likely eat up a lot of cpu power like most
voice recognition software. (I'm guessing)
==
To conclude:
I may be very wrong so please correct me but I am dilligent to keep
up on these things.
-- Benikus Rex
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe mess...