search for: benificial

...myGlobal ? 1.0f : -1.0f while after the transformation I get (myGlobal & 1) != 0 ? 1.0f : -1.0f which is not good for shading languages. So I can remove the transformation in my local copy (I found it by now) or if it would be possible to move it into the optimizer that needs it this would be benificial for me. -Jochen

...awaddell.com/2008_04_01_archive.html) I found that rsync + ZFS snapshot does the same job. It use rsync to make delta backups to the file server, and automatic ZFS snapshot to keep incrementals. Please give me some ideas to use this in my application... Please provide me some weblinks that can be benificial to use it. Thanks & Regards M Chauhan -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

...e after the transformation I get > (myGlobal & 1) != 0 ? 1.0f : -1.0f > which is not good for shading languages. > > So I can remove the transformation in my local copy (I found it by now) > or if it would be possible to > move it into the optimizer that needs it this would be benificial for me. > > -Jochen > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment wa...

Hi All How do I access a model from within the application.rb? What im tying to do is pull some data from a model (news in this case) that must be displayed on each page within the entire application. I know I could drop this into each controller, have each view pull it from the controller, but thats repeating myself... So whats the best way to do this (as I dont think models are visible

...tom-up approach (under a new misched option), but when a register-pressure/live-range trashhold value is reached, we bail and fall back to the top-down approach. This is my first rough idea, but I haven't looked at this problem for very long. My first few data points is suggesting this might be benificial, but I could be missing a lot here. And also I am sure that I am looking at an old/classic problem here and I'm sure others have looked at this problem before. Thus I am wondering if people have experiences/opinions on this. Cheers, Sjoerd. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any...

On Dec 27, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Jochen Wilhelmy wrote: > Hi! > > before InstCombine (llvm::createInstructionCombiningPass()) I have > a trunc from i8 to i1 and then a select: > > %45 = load i8* @myGlobal, align 1 > %tobool = trunc i8 %45 to i1 > %cond = select i1 %tobool, float 1.000000e+00, float -1.000000e+00 > > after instCombine I have: > > %29 = load i8*

...wever I have not heard anything > about it since. Is anybody still working on this? > Graphics tablet > support is the only thing stopping us from using Photoshop under Linux > at the present time. Moving all our graphics artists off dual booting > windows machines would be extremely benificial! > > I tried the original patch but found it affected the > stability of wine...

Hi! before InstCombine (llvm::createInstructionCombiningPass()) I have a trunc from i8 to i1 and then a select: %45 = load i8* @myGlobal, align 1 %tobool = trunc i8 %45 to i1 %cond = select i1 %tobool, float 1.000000e+00, float -1.000000e+00 after instCombine I have: %29 = load i8* @myGlobal, align 1 %30 = and i8 %29, 1 %tobool = icmp ne i8 %30, 0 %cond = select i1 %tobool, float 1.000000e+00,

This post appeared on another forum: Will CentOS become obsolete now because of the changes Red Hat is implementing? Red Hat has changed the way it distributes Enterprise Linux kernel code in an effort to prevent Oracle and Novell from stealing its customers, making it more difficult for these competitors to understand which patches have been applied where. Some have speculated that the change

Greg, I'm going to join issue with your here! Not that I'll go near advocating "Excel-style" graphics (abominable, and the Patrick Burns URL which you cite is remarkable in its restraint). Also, I'm aware that this is potential flame-war territory -- again, I want to avoid that too. However, this is the second time you have intervened on this theme (previously Mon 6