search for: benfits

Hi all, I'm new to the list but have benfited from it quite extensively. Straight to my rather strange question: I have a data frame that contains mapping rules in this way: ACCOUNT, RULE COLUMNS, Effective Date The dataframe comes from a database that stores all dates. What I would like to do is to create a data frame with only the most recent rule for each account. In traditional

Does vorbis have any niches of technical superiority over opus? Or is compatibility with older hard- and software the only benfit? Put another way, is there any reason to prefer vorbis over opus for music on new sortware or platforms? -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

I have a forum but, unlike most forum, posts are deleted periodically. I''d like the administrator to optionally choose whether or not he wants deleted posts archived (removed from the database but stored on the fileserver) so that he or she can do whatever with the posts. When a post is deleted, I''d like it to be saved as static HTML and have the appearance of however it

Dear to whom it may concern: My name is Matthew Bowman (Wiki username MatthewBowman) and I would like to contribute a few HowTos which I feel others may benefit from. I've recently setup numerous highly available services (using Heartbeat + DRBD) in chroot jails (I'm paranoid) and feel that many other users out there could benfit from my efforts. I was thinking I could setup one

Hi, When using the "Packages --> Install packages from local zip files" menu item in the windows-gui: 1) is that supposed to automatically pull in dependencies (in that case I have to fix something in my package). 2) If that's not the default: is there a way to make it so? Thanks, Joh

> Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb: > >> >> | A Friend told me, that the Profile Folder has to >> | be inside the Home-Directory to get it work. Is this >> | correct?? I do not want this. >> >> No. storing profiles in separate shares for NT4+ clients is >> the recommended method. >> > this is good news, but how do i get it work?? I always get

Hi All, I am experimenting to use Dovecot as an IMAP proxy to GMAIL server. I would like configure my localhost as an Dovecot IMAP proxy and trying to access my GMAIL using the Thunderbird email client. Please share the steps to configure and access my mails from GMAIL server. - Thanks CM Reddy

On 3/25/07, Christopher Lamb <christopher.lamb at gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't it possible to tell that certain DAG nodes are loop invariant prior to > instruction selection, such as a constant or global address node? Only in part. Selection of some nodes generates duplicate code in some backends and not others. A global that requires 2 instructions to load, as on alpha (where one

Hi, in approximately one months time mentoring institutions can propose projects for the Google Summer of Code 2009, see http://code.google.com/soc/ Last year the R Foundation succesfully participated with 4 projects, see http://www.r-project.org/SoC08/ for details. We want to participate again this year. Our project proposals will be managed by Manuel Eugster (email address in CC). Manuel

Hi all... I'm looking once again at the Syslinux roadmap. It seems to me that we're going to have a very hard time making Syslinux 4.00 be the full-featured everything-in-C release I had hoped for, or perhaps more specifically, that it is justifiable to sit on the current filesystems-in-C code waiting for the rest. That would probably mean productizing the transitional COM32R module

On Mar 25, 2007, at 2:21 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote: >> It seems to me that there is potential for doing some target >> independent loop >> invariant optimizations in the back end, but prior to instruction >> selection. > > I assume you mean after instruction selection? I assumed that to be target independent the

(Forwarding this to llvm-dev) This patch adds a unit test framework to LLVM, along with a sample unit test for DenseMap. I don't expect this patch to be accepted as-is, this is mainly a trial balloon and proof of concept. Some notes about the patch: 1) For the testing framework, I went with Google Test, since it's the one I have the most experience with. I fully expect an extended

"Does raidzN actually protect against bitrot?" That''s a kind of radical, possibly offensive, question formula that I have lately. Reading up on theory of RAID5, I grasped the idea of the write hole (where one of the sectors of the stripe, such as the parity data, doesn''t get written - leading to invalid data upon read). In general, I think the same applies to bitrot of