Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "benedito".
2018 Nov 23
1
[tryExcept] New try Function
...'try' in order to print the error if desired. All in all, this would be a
function for simple error handling, but I think it would be practical, and
you can always move to tryCatch if you need a more complex error handling.
I will be looking forward to hearing your insights.
Best,
Ernest Benedito
Missatge de Emil Bode <emil.bode at dans.knaw.nl> del dia dv., 23 de nov. 2018
a les 13:17:
> Hi Ernest,
>
> To start: I don't see an attachment, I think they're not (always) allowed
> on this mailing-list. If you want to send something, text is your safest
> bet.
>...
2018 Nov 22
2
[tryExcept] New try Function
Hi everyone,
When dealing with errors, sometimes I want to run a bunch of code when an error occurs.
For now I usually use a structure such as:
res <- tryCatch(expr, error = function(cond) cond) # or try(expr)
if (inherits(res, ?error?)) # or inherits(res, ?try-error?)
# a bunch of code
I though it would be useful to have a function that does this naturally, so I came up with the attached
2018 Nov 23
0
[tryExcept] New try Function
...is cumbersome, and it gets even more cumbersome if you want to access the error-object in #abunchofcode, or use #abunchofcode to return to a higher level, so I get it you're looking for a more elegant solution.
Best regards,
Emil Bode
?On 23/11/2018, 08:49, "R-devel on behalf of Ernest Benedito" <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of ebeneditos at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
When dealing with errors, sometimes I want to run a bunch of code when an error occurs.
For now I usually use a structure such as:
res <- tryCatch(expr, error = func...