Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "benedetta".
Did you mean:
benedetto
2013 Nov 25
4
lmer specification for random effects: contradictory reults
...sufficed.
Am I correct?
If so, should I take mod1 (mod1 <- dT_purs ~ T + Z + (1 + T | subject )
instead of mod2 to fit my data?
Why are these results contradictory?
Finally is a correlation value of -0.87 a too high or an acceptable value ?
Thanks for help me in advance!
Best
Benedetta
---
Benedetta Cesqui, Ph.D.
Laboratory of Neuromotor Physiology
IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia
Via Ardeatina 306
00179 Rome, Italy
tel: (+39) 06-51501485
fax:(+39) 06-51501482
E_mail: b.cesqui@hsantalucia.it
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2013 Nov 25
0
R: lmer specification for random effects: contradictory reults
...0.00322
p_valueTS = 0.4277
p_valueZS = 0.005701
I interpreted the ones relative to the random effects as if the subjects
differed not only in their overall responses, but also in the nature of
their response dT_purse values in the different T conditions, but not in the
different Z conditions.
Benedetta
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: ONKELINX, Thierry [mailto:Thierry.ONKELINX@inbo.be]
Inviato: lunedì 25 novembre 2013 14:48
A: Benedetta Cesqui; r-help@r-project.org
Cc: r-sig-mixed-models@r-project.org
Oggetto: RE: [R] lmer specification for random effects: contradictory reults
Dear Benedetta...