Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "benchmrk".
Did you mean:
benchmark
2004 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM benchmarks against GCC
...haps it is OK...
if not, then I am sorry.
So, what about current status of benchmarks?
I mean comparison to gcc.
I have looked at
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/
Unfortunatelly graphs lines are hardly for human eye,
but tables are OK.
I give my own interpretation for April 26, 2004 benchmrking
tests, please don't beat me if i am wrong, but correct me.
Focus of my attention is the time of execution of the program,
i.e., fields GCC/CBE and GCC/LLC.
For me it looks like following.
----------------------------------------------------
1. Programs/External:
a) CBE code is already...
2004 Apr 27
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM benchmarks against GCC
...at there is often a bit of noise in those numbers. In particular,
the programs are only run once and "real" time is reported. The nightly
tester runs in the middle of the night so the machine is still unloaded,
but noise is an issue.
> I give my own interpretation for April 26, 2004 benchmrking tests,
> please don't beat me if i am wrong, but correct me. Focus of my
> attention is the time of execution of the program, i.e., fields GCC/CBE
> and GCC/LLC.
Yup, that's a good idea. You might also be interested in LLC-LS, which is
the X86 backend with the global register...