search for: belon

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:28:13PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: > > It doesn't work for me at first since in my llvm there's only > llvm.bpf.load.*. > > I think llvm.bpf.store.* belone to some patches you haven't posted yet? nope. only loads have special instructions ld_abs/ld_ind which are represented by these intrinsics. stores, so far, are done via single bpf_store_bytes() helper function. > >the typeid changing ids with order is surprising. > >I think the a...

...should be in intervall of [0,1], am I correct? Have I done something wrong? Or should I interpret the negative value as the two methods do not group the cases to the same cluster? I have for example used k-means and k-median, and choosen five clusters. Each respondent has been labelled as either beloning to cluster 1,2,3,4 or 5. I have picked out the first 32 respondents. Example: a <- c(1,2,3,4,5,2,1,5,1,2,2,4,2,3,3,2,4,5,5,4,4,4,5,5,2,3,1,5,5,5,4,1) b <- c(5,5,5,2,5,3,2,2,2,5,3,4,5,5,2,5,2,3,5,5,5,3,5,3,3,2,4,5,2,2,2,3) adjustedRandIndex (a,b) [1] -0.01608168 Thanks in advanc...

On 8/4/15 11:51 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote: > void bpf_store_half(void *skb, int off, int val) > asm("llvm.bpf.store.half"); > int func() > { > bpf_store_half(0, 0, 0); > return 0; > } > > Compiled with: > > $ clang -g -target bpf -O2 -S -c test.c > > And get this: > > .text > .globl func > .align

Hi all, I've an asterisk ver 1.4.22. As in object I have an extension beloning to a queue. I need that for an external incoming call, the extension recieve the call waiting signal/tone, whereas for internal incoming call, the extension appear busy. Is it possible? Could someone let me know the right way to do that? thanks a lot in advance lorenzo -- "Chi vive spera...

....rubyonrails.com/read/book/19 LineItem Columns (0.361000) SHOW FIELDS FROM line_items You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! The error occured while evaluating nil.primary_key_name c:/program files/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.2/lib/active_record/associations/belon gs_to_association.rb:52:in `foreign_key_ present''..... I figured out to run ''rails .'' and then do a full compare, adjusting any differences as needed. That was easier than I feared. I confess I''ve never run ''rake test'' and don''t know...

Gregory Haskins wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > >> ok but now as qemu code was imported into kvm, then it's probably would >> be better to witch gcc-4.x? > > Sure. Are you volunteering? ;) I'm sure both upstream QEMU developers, > KVM developers, and the community using either would be most > appreciative. I know I

Greetings, Attached patch "fixes" the following warning while compiling with gcc 3.4.5, openssh 4.3p2 in an AMD64 Linux system, which is triggered by the comparison between off_t (signed long) and size_t (unsigned long) as shown : scp.c: In function `source': scp.c:632: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned scp.c:639: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned I am