search for: beignet

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "beignet".

Did you mean: be2net
2015 May 27
2
[LLVMdev] Beignet Backend as an LLVM Target
Dear LLVM experts! we would like to use BeignetBackend as and LLVM Target It shown in teh Beignet code there is a note "Well, the complete code base is somehow a compiler backend for LLVM. Here, we really speak about the final code generation passes that you may find in `src/backend`." http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet...
2016 Apr 25
2
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
...ed in LLVM. There are number of solutions from Intel, not saying of others, - it would be reasonable to become a platform for all of them, and I got positive feedback on the idea within. To name a few (don't take it as an ad): - Hetero Streams Library, https://01.org/hetero-streams-library - Beignet Project, https://01.org/beignet - Math Kernel Libraries, https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl - Intel Compiler, https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-compilers I believe we shouldn't make any difference between StreamExecutor and other projects and to try to plug one into the other or...
2016 Apr 25
2
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
...not >> saying of others, - it would be reasonable to become a platform for all of >> them, and I got positive feedback on the idea within. >> To name a few (don't take it as an ad): >> >> - Hetero Streams Library, https://01.org/hetero-streams-library >> - Beignet Project, https://01.org/beignet >> - Math Kernel Libraries, https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl >> - Intel Compiler, https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-compilers >> >> I believe we shouldn't make any difference between StreamExecutor and >> other proje...
2016 Apr 22
9
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > I feel like this thread got a bit stalled. I'd like to pick it up and try to suggest a path forward. > > I don't hear any real objections to the overall idea of having an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtimes and support libraries. I think we should get that created. I think it