Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "beignet".
Did you mean:
be2net
2015 May 27
2
[LLVMdev] Beignet Backend as an LLVM Target
Dear LLVM experts!
we would like to use BeignetBackend
as and LLVM Target
It shown in teh Beignet code there is a note
"Well, the complete code base is somehow a compiler backend for LLVM.
Here, we
really speak about the final code generation passes that you may find in
`src/backend`."
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet...
2016 Apr 25
2
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
...ed in LLVM. There are number of solutions from Intel,
not saying of others, - it would be reasonable to become a platform for all
of them, and I got positive feedback on the idea within.
To name a few (don't take it as an ad):
- Hetero Streams Library, https://01.org/hetero-streams-library
- Beignet Project, https://01.org/beignet
- Math Kernel Libraries, https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl
- Intel Compiler, https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-compilers
I believe we shouldn't make any difference between StreamExecutor and other
projects and to try to plug one into the other or...
2016 Apr 25
2
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
...not
>> saying of others, - it would be reasonable to become a platform for all of
>> them, and I got positive feedback on the idea within.
>> To name a few (don't take it as an ad):
>>
>> - Hetero Streams Library, https://01.org/hetero-streams-library
>> - Beignet Project, https://01.org/beignet
>> - Math Kernel Libraries, https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl
>> - Intel Compiler, https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-compilers
>>
>> I believe we shouldn't make any difference between StreamExecutor and
>> other proje...
2016 Apr 22
9
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I feel like this thread got a bit stalled. I'd like to pick it up and try to suggest a path forward.
>
> I don't hear any real objections to the overall idea of having an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtimes and support libraries. I think we should get that created.
I think it