search for: beheaviour

Dear friends, I stumbled into beheaviour of read.delim which I would consider a bug or at least an inconsistency that should be improved upon. Recently we had to work with data that used "", two double quotes, as symbol to start and end character input. Essentially the data looked like this data.csv ======== V1, V2, V3 "...

Dear all, I need to understand a thing in the beheaviour of the two functions aov and anova in the following case involving an analysis of ANOVA with repeated measures: If I use the folowing command I don´t get any problem: >aov1 = aov(response ~ stimulus*condition + Error(subject/(stimulus*condition)), >data=scrd) > summary(aov1) Instead i...

...3381 alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval: -2.29198603 -0.09849016 sample estimates: mean of x mean of y 3.733333 4.928571 #Now we have a significative difference between these two stimuli (p-value = 0.03381) Why I get this beheaviour? Moreover, how by means of ANOVA I could track the significative differences between the stimuli presented in A and AH condition whitout doing the t-test? Please help! Thanks in advance -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed......

Egregious, look what just happened few minutes ago while opening up my program and running the scripts > A<-read.table("C:\\Documents and Settings\\ + me\\Desktop\\TESI\\generale.txt",head=T) Errore: non trovo la funzione "read.table" #CAN'T FIND read.table FUNTION!!!??? ARE WE ok??? > > B<-read.table("C:\\Documents and Settings\\ +

Hello friends, I am experiencing some weird beheaviour on one of my computers. I appologize for the laconic subject, but I really don't know anything more than that. I'll tell the story in chronological order. I have an HP server with five SCSI disks. The disks are _not_ in RAID. I installed FC2 on one disk. I installed a 2.6.11.7 and used i...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15753 Summary: [Dualhead, randr12] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: xake at

...: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Here you can notice that the pvalue for stimulus:condition (and therefore also for the stimulus flat_550_W_realism in the 2 conditions A and AH) is 0.9955, so this time the difference is not significative. Now, could someone explain me this beheaviour? I really do not understand. Do I have to believe to ANOVA or to t-test? Help!!! Which kind of analysis can I do?..and how can I interpret the results in the right way? Is there anyone that can show me how to conduct the analysis with R? Thanks in advance [[alternative HTML ver...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13864 Summary: crash with RandR12 on server restart Product: xorg Version: 7.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy:

Dear all, I would like to know which is the right way to check the normality assumption for performing ANOVA. How do you check normality for the following example? I did an experiment where people had to evaluate on a 7 point scale, the degree of realism of some stimuli presented in 2 conditions. The problem is that if I check normality with the Shapiro test I get that the data are not

- This avoids problematic "reloc'ed while mapped" messages and some associated corruption as well. Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.h | 3 +++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_stateobj.h | 13 +++++++++++++