search for: beforce

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "beforce".

Did you mean: geforce
2007 May 28
0
have anyone configured "synproxy state" beforce (Sorry for the previouly base64 encode mail caused by M$ outlook)
high everyone,( in pariticular Max :-)) The configuration line in my pf.conf is: pass in quick on lo0 proto tcp from any to any port 21 flags S/SA synproxy state But: the connection is established, but the control did not seams to pass to the ftpd Sincerely yours Zhouyi Zhou
2007 May 28
0
have anyone configured "synproxy state" beforce
high everyone pass in quick on lo0 proto tcp from any to any port 21 flags S/SA synproxy state the connection is established, but the control did not seams to pass to the ftpd
2008 Jan 05
1
[PATCH][RESEND] Relax BUG_ON()s when enabling/disabling virt_ring interrupts
...hen callbacks were disabled and enabled respectively. However, in the current vring implementation, this isn't actually a bug. What's more, the virtio_net driver does not guard against double enabling or double disabling. All that needs to happen is for an rx notification to happen twice beforce the virtnet_poll function is invoked to trigger the BUG_ON. This patch removes the BUG_ON()s since there are no negative side effects in the current vring code. In the future, if a ring implementation cannot support double enabling or double disabling, it is far easier for them to handle this by...
2008 Jan 05
1
[PATCH][RESEND] Relax BUG_ON()s when enabling/disabling virt_ring interrupts
...hen callbacks were disabled and enabled respectively. However, in the current vring implementation, this isn't actually a bug. What's more, the virtio_net driver does not guard against double enabling or double disabling. All that needs to happen is for an rx notification to happen twice beforce the virtnet_poll function is invoked to trigger the BUG_ON. This patch removes the BUG_ON()s since there are no negative side effects in the current vring code. In the future, if a ring implementation cannot support double enabling or double disabling, it is far easier for them to handle this by...