search for: beforce

high everyone,( in pariticular Max :-)) The configuration line in my pf.conf is: pass in quick on lo0 proto tcp from any to any port 21 flags S/SA synproxy state But: the connection is established, but the control did not seams to pass to the ftpd Sincerely yours Zhouyi Zhou

high everyone pass in quick on lo0 proto tcp from any to any port 21 flags S/SA synproxy state the connection is established, but the control did not seams to pass to the ftpd

...hen callbacks were disabled and enabled respectively. However, in the current vring implementation, this isn't actually a bug. What's more, the virtio_net driver does not guard against double enabling or double disabling. All that needs to happen is for an rx notification to happen twice beforce the virtnet_poll function is invoked to trigger the BUG_ON. This patch removes the BUG_ON()s since there are no negative side effects in the current vring code. In the future, if a ring implementation cannot support double enabling or double disabling, it is far easier for them to handle this by...

...hen callbacks were disabled and enabled respectively. However, in the current vring implementation, this isn't actually a bug. What's more, the virtio_net driver does not guard against double enabling or double disabling. All that needs to happen is for an rx notification to happen twice beforce the virtnet_poll function is invoked to trigger the BUG_ON. This patch removes the BUG_ON()s since there are no negative side effects in the current vring code. In the future, if a ring implementation cannot support double enabling or double disabling, it is far easier for them to handle this by...