search for: befoe

Currently using Samba 4 as AD at the main site and would like the main site AD to authenticate users at a remote site (about 3 systems). As I use my domain management system from a remote location via VPN I know this works, but the VPN may not be the lowest cost in terms of overhead. What other options are available? I'm thinking that port forwarding between the sites may incur the least

...es may incur the least > > overhead (which ports?). What are the common (and maybe not so common) > > practices in place for this scenario? > > frankly you even need bridged VPN instead routed - so how should this > work with port forwarding adn what problem do you try to solve befoe > come up with solutions? >From my office here I just use a site-to-site vpn when I need to manage the AD via RSAT. Normally my site-to-site VPN is down, but in the case of the small remote site contact with the AD would need to be full time. If it can be done easily with port forwarding it...

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 02:56:42PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > In the pv_scan_next() function, the slow cmpxchg atomic operation is > performed even if the other CPU is not even close to being halted. This > extra cmpxchg can harm slowpath performance. > > This patch introduces the new mayhalt flag to indicate if the other > spinning CPU is close to being halted or not. The

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 02:56:42PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > In the pv_scan_next() function, the slow cmpxchg atomic operation is > performed even if the other CPU is not even close to being halted. This > extra cmpxchg can harm slowpath performance. > > This patch introduces the new mayhalt flag to indicate if the other > spinning CPU is close to being halted or not. The

...t at all sure you can make assumptions like that. And the > worst part is, if it goes wrong the borkage is subtle and painful.\ I have to agree with Peter. But it goes beyond this particular patch. Patterns like this: xchg(&pn->mayhalt, true); are just evil and disgusting. Even befoe this patch, that code had (void)xchg(&pn->state, vcpu_halted); which is *wrong* and should never be done. If you want it to be "set_mb()" (which sets a value and has a memory barrier), then use set_mb(). Yes, it happens to use a "xchg()" to do so, but d...

I'm having trouble configuring these services the way I want. Basically I prefer using iLBC before GSM, however Iaxtel only want to talk GSM. It _seems_ that Voicepulse prefers GSM also, because even if I put ILBC before GSM in the "allow=" part of iax.conf, if GSM is mentioned, Voicepulse will use it. If I don't allow GSM Voicepulse will use ILBC. Does anyone know how to

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216 Bug ID: 1216 Summary: Error messaging for "interval overlaps with previous one" misidentifies location Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5