search for: beegfs

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 01:41:57AM +0800, Shenyue Chen wrote: > Hi Jeremy, thanks for the quick response! > Yes, BeeGFS is a clustered file system. It's just behaving like a regular > FS after mounted.? > We mount it on the SMB server and re-export the mounted folder to the > linux CIFS clients. > Here is a config file on the SMB server FYI. Most of the options?we keep > default.? So yo...

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:08:56AM +0800, Shenyue Chen wrote: > Thanks for the advice, Jeremy and Ralph. We'll definitely give the new > version a try,? > I guess I still need to clarify my comparison setting?a little bit: > Let's say the BeeGFS folder path on SMB server is /mnt/beegfs. > This folder is exported via Samba, and mounted on CIFS clients in /mnt/smb > The 1st benchmark?is done on /mnt/smb: 2 level of redirection > The 2nd benchmark is done on /mnt/beegfs: 1 level of redirection, actually > no SMB involved h...

Hi Samba users, We would like to use samba for re-exporting our other distributed file system (BeeGFS). However, we found that the meta data operations are very slow (dir stat, removal etc.). On SMB client the performance is more than 30x slow than on the SMB server. We would expect some slowness but this is too big a drop. This is the result on CIFS client $ sudo mdtest -b 10 -I 10 -L -z 2 mdte...

Hi Diego, I have had a look at BeeGFS and is seems more similar to ceph then to gluster. It requires extra management nodes similar to ceph, right? Second of all there are no snapshots in BeeGFS, as I understand it. I know ceph has snapshots so for us this seems a better alternative. What is your experience of ceph? I am sorry to hear...

...require "extra" nodes (metadata and monitor), but those can be virtual machines or you can host the services on OSD machines. We don't use snapshots, so I can't comment on that. My experience with Ceph is limited to having it working on Proxmox. No experience yet with CephFS. BeeGFS is more like a "freemium" FS: the base functionality is free, but if you need "enterprise" features (quota, replication...) you have to pay (quite a lot... probably not to compromise lucrative GPFS licensing). We also saw more than 30 minutes for an ls on a Gluster directory...

...require "extra" nodes (metadata and monitor), but those can be virtual machines or you can host the services on OSD machines. We don't use snapshots, so I can't comment on that. My experience with Ceph is limited to having it working on Proxmox. No experience yet with CephFS. BeeGFS is more like a "freemium" FS: the base functionality is free, but if you need "enterprise" features (quota, replication...) you have to pay (quite a lot... probably not to compromise lucrative GPFS licensing). We also saw more than 30 minutes for an ls on a Gluster directory...

Hi. I'm also migrating to BeeGFS and CephFS (depending on usage). What I liked most about Gluster was that files were easily recoverable from bricks even in case of disaster and that it said it supported RDMA. But I soon found that RDMA was being phased out, and I always find entries that are not healing after a couple months...

Dear all, I'm rather new to glusterfs but have some experience running lager lustre and beegfs installations. These filesystems provide active/active failover. Now, I discovered that I can also do this in glusterfs, although I didn't find detailed documentation about it. (I'm using glusterfs 3.10.8) So my question is: can I really use glusterfs to do failover in the way described b...

...ers each with enough disk to make two copies of the data, all for less dollars... Regards, Alex On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Stefan Solbrig <stefan.solbrig at ur.de> wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm rather new to glusterfs but have some experience running lager lustre > and beegfs installations. These filesystems provide active/active > failover. Now, I discovered that I can also do this in glusterfs, although > I didn't find detailed documentation about it. (I'm using glusterfs 3.10.8) > > So my question is: can I really use glusterfs to do failover in...

...r less dollars... > > Regards, > Alex > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Stefan Solbrig <stefan.solbrig at ur.de <mailto:stefan.solbrig at ur.de>> wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm rather new to glusterfs but have some experience running lager lustre and beegfs installations. These filesystems provide active/active failover. Now, I discovered that I can also do this in glusterfs, although I didn't find detailed documentation about it. (I'm using glusterfs 3.10.8) > > So my question is: can I really use glusterfs to do failover in the way d...

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:37:43PM +0100, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: >On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:35:00PM +0100, Stephan Roth via samba wrote: >>My goal with activating vfs_fruit was to speed up directory listings >>for Mac clients, which works. Can the accompanying slowdown for >>Windows clients be avoided? > >yeah, I guess so, but somebody has to dig through the

29.10.2023 00:07, Zakhar Kirpichenko ?????: > I don't think it's worth it for anyone. It's a dead project since > about 9.0, if not earlier. Well, really earlier. Attempt to get better gluster as gluster2 in 4.0 failed...

...cache or dentry cache that could accelerate this, under the loose cache policy? Or is this the expected behavior? Shenyue Chen <chensy1996 at gmail.com> ?2023?3?10??? 01:15??? > Hi Samba users, > > We would like to use samba for re-exporting our other distributed file > system (BeeGFS). However, we found that the meta data operations are very > slow (dir stat, removal etc.). On SMB client the performance is more than > 30x slow than on the SMB server. We would expect some slowness but this is > too big a drop. > > This is the result on CIFS client > > $ sudo...

Hi, Red Hat Gluster Storage is EOL, Red Hat moved Gluster devs to other projects, so Gluster doesn't get much attention. From my experience, it has deteriorated since about version 9.0, and we're migrating to alternatives. /Z On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 10:29, Marcus Peders?n <marcus.pedersen at slu.se> wrote: > Hi all, > I just have a general thought about the gluster >

...ly does: $ mkdir -p path/pkg ## empty final destination placeholder(?) $ mkdir -p path/to/pkg $ mv -f path/to/pkg path However, on one (and only one) of several systems I've tested, that 'mv' produce the error: mv: cannot move ?path/to/pkg? to ?path/pkg?: File exists This is on a BeeGFS parallel file system. I cannot tell if that 'mv -f' should work or not, or if it is even well defined. FWIW, the above 'mv' does indeed work if I switch to another folder that is mounted on a different, NFS, file system, i.e. it is not kernel/OS specific (here CentOS 7.6.1810). I...

...ir -p path/to/pkg > > $ mv -f path/to/pkg path > > > > However, on one (and only one) of several systems I've tested, that > > 'mv' produce the error: > > > > mv: cannot move ?path/to/pkg? to ?path/pkg?: File exists > > > > This is on a BeeGFS parallel file system. I cannot tell if that 'mv > > -f' should work or not, or if it is even well defined. FWIW, the > > above 'mv' does indeed work if I switch to another folder that is > > mounted on a different, NFS, file system, i.e. it is not kernel/OS >...

...al destination placeholder(?) > $ mkdir -p path/to/pkg > $ mv -f path/to/pkg path > > However, on one (and only one) of several systems I've tested, that > 'mv' produce the error: > > mv: cannot move ?path/to/pkg? to ?path/pkg?: File exists > > This is on a BeeGFS parallel file system. I cannot tell if that 'mv > -f' should work or not, or if it is even well defined. FWIW, the > above 'mv' does indeed work if I switch to another folder that is > mounted on a different, NFS, file system, i.e. it is not kernel/OS > specific (here...

...;> $ mv -f path/to/pkg path >>> >>> However, on one (and only one) of several systems I've tested, that >>> 'mv' produce the error: >>> >>> mv: cannot move ?path/to/pkg? to ?path/pkg?: File exists >>> >>> This is on a BeeGFS parallel file system. I cannot tell if that 'mv >>> -f' should work or not, or if it is even well defined. FWIW, the >>> above 'mv' does indeed work if I switch to another folder that is >>> mounted on a different, NFS, file system, i.e. it is not kernel...