search for: beefier

...orced to use their build in protocol policies versus the firewalling I am used to (Deny All and then opening holes for specific IP's, etc). There are so many firewall distros to choose from. FireStarter, IPCOP, etc. The box I was going to use is a P4, 3GB RAM, 3 GB NICS. I could always use a beefier box also if there was really a need to for such a task. I am used to some Cisco PIX boxes and they just seem fast on hardly any specs. I had a PIX 525 that only had 256mb of RAM about 8 years ago and it was a rockstar. Thoughts, opinions, suggestions are welcome as to what to do! -Jason

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:23:02PM -0500, S. A. Ridley wrote: > hangs, etc. So the multiplexer has to be a little beefier than I was first > assuming. Its still pretty surprising that a generic library to multiplex > over TCP is not more common. Something that would let you create a in > initial stream and then create "sub-streams" and expose a "mux_write()" and > "mux_read()"...

...ch of a computer would be required to do this. We might be able to get a dual PIII 550Mhz machine with 512 ECC SDRam donated, or we are looking at purchasing a dual Xeon 2.4Ghz machine with 1Gb of ram. Would be able to get away with the machine that we can get donated, or should we invest in some beefier hardware, and if so, would this machine be enough? Thank a bunch! -Matt

...oducts/Motherboard/Products_Spec.aspx?ClassValue=Motherboard&ProductID=1762&ProductName=GA-7VRXP CPU is a single AMD XP2100+ Disk is a normal IDE Maxtor Memory 3 G of DDR SDRAM I can install CentOS 3.8 on this machine just fine, but I would like to move to CentOS 4 because that is what my beefier database machines are running (or will when I get the rest of them upgraded). Thanks for any help folks can give me. -- Cynthia Kiser

hi guys, I'd like to ask, and I believe this place here should be best as who can know better, if building R with different compilers and opt flags is something worth investing time into? Or maybe this a subject that somebody has already investigated. If yes what then are the conclusion? Reason I ask is such that, on Centos 7.6 with different compilers from stock repo but also from so

Hi Guys, 2012/7/20 juantello <juantello1234 at gmail.com>: > > Hello. > > Icecast client for android > http://droidtools.sourceforge.net/content/icecast-client-android > http://droidtools.sourceforge.net/content/libogglibvorbis-and-libshout-libraries-android I just finished compiling an android version of our reshaped shine encoder [1] there:

I believe 30 sec is the default for the checkpoint interval.  Is this adjustable? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Dear R-help: Has anyone tried using R on the the AMD Opteron in either 64- or 32-bit mode? If so, any good/bad experiences, comments, etc? We are considering getting this hardware, and would like to know if R can run smoothly on such a beast. Any comment much appreciated. Best, Andy Andy Liaw, PhD Biometrics Research PO Box 2000, RY33-300 Merck Research Labs Rahway, NJ

...h regards to compile-for-performance > | subject? > > Of course you do that, and add those switches to ~/.R/Makeconf. The > resulting binaries may become non-portable. > > E.g. "at work" we use -march=native quite a bit but it means can't share > libraries from a beefier dev box with skinnier deployment boxen as they don't > have the same chipset even thought the are both x86_64 and use the same Linux > distro. > > As for which switches help in which way on different compiler: that is > probably best seen as a black box. Time and profile local...

...t; > > > We might be able to get a dual PIII 550Mhz machine with 512 ECC SDRam > > donated, or we are looking at purchasing a dual Xeon 2.4Ghz machine > > with 1Gb of ram. Would be able to get away with the machine that we > > can get donated, or should we invest in some beefier hardware, and if > > so, would this machine be enough? > > > > Thank a bunch! > > -Matt > > _______________________________________________ > > Icecast mailing list > > Icecast@xiph.org > > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast > > >...

So I''m still working on a ''perfect'' setup so I can document it on the wiki, and will submit some puppet patches against 0.23.2 next week, but here''s what I''ve done that has made a big difference to stability here. in puppetmasterd at line 261, I''ve modified the Mongrel instantiation from: server = Mongrel::HttpServer.new(addr,

...ng a MUX, like QoS. You would think you could just have a big loop in the heart of the mux that select()s and does the read/write accordingly, but there are anumber of issues introduced when you dynamically add a "channel", or if a channel hangs, etc. So the multiplexer has to be a little beefier than I was first assuming. Its still pretty surprising that a generic library to multiplex over TCP is not more common. Something that would let you create a in initial stream and then create "sub-streams" and expose a "mux_write()" and "mux_read()" or something, and h...

Have you looked at liboggz and libfishsound? Jean-Marc S. A. Ridley wrote: > Hey folks, > I just unsubscribed from the vorbis-dev mailinglist (several days ago) > after a year or so of being subscribed, and today I run into a project > that will probably require using Ogg :-). > The project I am working on has a fairly quick timeline, and as a result > have to cut corners.

...e required to do this. > > We might be able to get a dual PIII 550Mhz machine with 512 ECC SDRam > donated, or we are looking at purchasing a dual Xeon 2.4Ghz machine > with 1Gb of ram. Would be able to get away with the machine that we > can get donated, or should we invest in some beefier hardware, and if > so, would this machine be enough? > > Thank a bunch! > -Matt > _______________________________________________ > Icecast mailing list > Icecast@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast > Adam Hyde adam@xs4all.nl r a d i o q u a l i...

...Original > Encoding "bla.wav" to "bla.mp3" > Finished in 0: 0:20 > > If anyone else feels like testing on another ARM android phone, I'll > be interested to know if the encoder may be used to encode to mp3 in > real time... It works much better with a beefier android device (HTC One V): shell at android:/data/shine $ shineenc ./bla.wav ./bla.mp3 shineenc (Liquidsoap version) WAV PCM DATA, stereo 44100Hz 16bit, Length: 0: 3:36 MPEG-I layer III, stereo Psychoacoustic Model: Shine Bitrate=128 kbps De-emphasis: none Original Encoding "./bla.wav&q...

...t do devel can say and advise with regards to compile-for-performance | subject? Of course you do that, and add those switches to ~/.R/Makeconf. The resulting binaries may become non-portable. E.g. "at work" we use -march=native quite a bit but it means can't share libraries from a beefier dev box with skinnier deployment boxen as they don't have the same chipset even thought the are both x86_64 and use the same Linux distro. As for which switches help in which way on different compiler: that is probably best seen as a black box. Time and profile locally, I no longer try to g...

...ime du 220240 ./cur 0 ./new 0 ./tmp 234776 . real 1m35.207s user 0m0.060s sys 0m1.850s maagd:~/Maildir/.sent$ >I'm using an Am486DX4-100 with 64 MB to serve my personal mail. (about >650 >MB distributed over about 100 imap folders) indeed, so 160 mb on a beefier machine shouldn't be a problem. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen at xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

I need to set up a samba server (I think samba 3.0.2 will be the one) as PDC for my school. It needs to serve mandatory profiles, home dirs, shares, printers. As OS I think redhat will do just fine (or isn't that a good idea?). Authentication would use openLDAP (if I get it online with the hints of realx). Questions: 1. What hardware will do a fine job to do this? 2. Can a webserver run

On 08/02/2023 12:48, Luke Barone via samba wrote: > hide unreadable = yes > > I was under the impression this was a very time consuming option in > domains. > > Just making myself an opticians appointment, how did I miss that ? Probably fixated on the bad sanitisation. Rowland

...e > > | subject? > > > > Of course you do that, and add those switches to ~/.R/Makeconf. The > > resulting binaries may become non-portable. > > > > E.g. "at work" we use -march=native quite a bit but it means can't share > > libraries from a beefier dev box with skinnier deployment boxen as they > don't > > have the same chipset even thought the are both x86_64 and use the same > Linux > > distro. > > > > As for which switches help in which way on different compiler: that is > > probably best seen as a b...