Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bee3n".
Did you mean:
bee3
2020 Jun 17
4
Blog article about the state of CentOS
Once upon a time, Noam Bernstein <noam.bernstein at nrl.navy.mil> said:
> Of course. My only question is whether the observation that the gap for CentOS 8 is indeed larger than we have come to be used to for CentOS 7.
So, I took a look... and the answer is "it's not" (with a small sample
set). I took dates from Wikipedia for RHEL and the archived release
notes for
2020 Jun 19
0
Blog article about the state of CentOS
...019-11-05 2020-01-15 71
> 8.2 2020-04-28 2020-06-15 48
>
Your dates are significantly off
Wikipedia has a delay listed in a table:
It is, for CentOS-7, For example:
7.0 27
7.1 26
7.2 25
7.3 39
7.4 43
7.5 31
7.6 34
7.7 42
7.8 28
For 6 .. since 6.2, it has bee3n between 10 and 18 days.
For 8:
8.0 140
8.1 71
8.2 48
And EL8 is exponentially harder with an entirely new build system and
the requirement to build modules.
2020 Jun 20
3
Blog article about the state of CentOS
...te:
> Your dates are significantly off
> Wikipedia has a delay listed in a table:
>
> It is, for CentOS-7, For example:
>
> 7.0 27
> 7.1 26
> 7.2 25
> 7.3 39
> 7.4 43
> 7.5 31
> 7.6 34
> 7.7 42
> 7.8 28
>
>
> For 6 .. since 6.2, it has bee3n between 10 and 18 days.
>
> For 8:
>
> 8.0 140
> 8.1 71
> 8.2 48
So the delays for 8 are significantly longer than they ever were for 7.
> And EL8 is exponentially harder with an entirely new build system and
> the requirement to build modules.
But it seems like ever...