search for: beding

Thanks for your help. > On the Windows DC can you check that the A record is actually created? Yes, it is, and it persists after join failure. Another sign of presence of SRVAD-NEW on the old DC is the new computer account, created in "Domain controllers" folder in "Active Directory Users and Computers" at the beginning of join procedure then automatically removed just

Tested again to join, now clearing both Kerberos, Samba config and Samba private folder. The new log now has some more details (resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name SRVAD-OLD.SAMDOM.LOCAL<0x20>), but I'm still not able to join. Wonder why is it trying to do an lmhosts lookup, 4.6 is not. An identical server (with same hostname and IP) with Samba 4.6 joins without

Tested again to join, now clearing both Kerberos, Samba config and Samba private folder. The new log now has some more details (resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name SRVAD-OLD.SAMDOM.LOCAL<0x20>), but I'm still not able to join. Wonder why is it trying to do an lmhosts lookup, 4.6 is not. An identical server (with same hostname and IP) with Samba 4.6 joins without

It seems I'm talking to myself... anyway another test here: Added the existing DC IP config to /etc/hosts and the join now shows a more explicit LDAP error: --- Wrong username or password: kinit for SRVAD-NEW$@SAMDOM.LOCAL failed (Preauthentication failed) SPNEGO(gssapi_krb5) creating NEG_TOKEN_INIT for ldap/SRVAD-OLD.SAMDOM.LOCAL failed (next[ntlmssp]): NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Got

Can you specify the full DN of the DNS record in question? Afterwards, maybe you can also try deleting that DNS record and retry the join? Failed to find machine account is almost certainly an unrelated debug message. I don't think it has any relation to your issue. Cheers, Garming On 26/02/18 00:28, Claudio Nicora via samba wrote: > Tried again to join, now with full cleanup of

Tried again to join, now with full cleanup of /var/lib/samba/private folder on new server... same error. Anyone have an idea of what's going wrong? Il 23/02/2018 09:52, Claudio Nicora via samba ha scritto: > Thanks for your help. > >> On the Windows DC can you check that the A record is actually created? > > Yes, it is, and it persists after join failure. > Another

Thanks for the time you're dedicating to solving my issue. > Is your WORKGROUP really the same as your dnsdomain ? > So, the command should be: > samba-tool domain join samdom.local DC -U Administrator --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --verbose -d3 I've replaced log sensitive data before posting it (replacing real domain name with SAMDOM), but replace was case-insensitive so

This could be the right way... > There is a bit of a problem with that, it should be: > > DC=SRVAD-NEW,DC=samdom.local,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=SAMDOM,DC=LOCAL The SAMDOM.LOCAL zone is set to replicate to the whole forest (maybe I've missed that info on DNS config, anyway Domain-only replication is ok for me too). I've changed it to replicate to only Domain DNS and

On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 11:43:37 +0100 Claudio Nicora via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > If I create SRVAD-NEW DNS record manually, under samdom.local zone, > this is what I see with adsiedit: > > distinguishedName: > DC=SRVAD-NEW,DC=samdom.local,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=SAMDOM,DC=LOCAL > There is a bit of a problem with that, it should be:

I have an existing Win2008-R2 domain with a single DC and I'd like to replace this DC with a Samba 4 DC. I'm using VirtualBox VMs to test the migration before going to production. I've cloned Windows 2008R2 Server into the first VM, then installed Ubuntu_18.04_server_x64_daily (Samba 4.7.4) into another VM. Win2008-R2:?? hostname=SRVAD-OLD, IP: 10.0.3.90 Ubuntu_18.04:

all.vars works fine, EXCEPT, it give a bit too much. I only want the regression variables, but in the following example I also get "k" the variable holding the chosen knots. Any machinery to find only "real" regression variables? cheers, Bendix library( splines ) y <- rnorm(100) x <- rnorm(100) k <- -1:1 ml <- lm( y ~ bs(x,knots=k) ) mg <- glm( y ~

I would like to extract the names, modes [numeric/factor] and levels of variables needed in a data frame supplied as newdata= argument to predict.glm() Here is a small example illustrating my troubles; what I want from (both of) the glm objects is the vector c("x","f","Y") and an indication that f is a factor: library( splines ) dd <- data.frame( D =

...for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data. ~ John Tukey * * * * * * * * * * * * * D I S C L A I M E R * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen geven enkel de visie van de schrijver weer en binden het INBO onder geen enkel beding, zolang dit bericht niet bevestigd is door een geldig ondertekend document. The views expressed in this message and any annex are purely those of the writer and may not be regarded as stating an official position of INBO, as long as the message is not confirmed by a duly signed document.

Dear Sirs, I need to make a backup of email accounts (Maildir) a Linux server to a Windows server with NTFS, but get the following error: rsync: rename "/mnt/rsync/cur/137D94_29.ml110c.qnet.com.pe,S=32828:2,S.M92y5w" -> "cur/137D94_29.ml110c.qnet.com.pe,S=32828:2,S": Invalid argument (22) I have installed Rsync v3.0.9 The command is executed: rsync -rltDvu

...e for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data. ~ John Tukey * * * * * * * * * * * * * D I S C L A I M E R * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen geven enkel de visie van de schrijver weer en binden het INBO onder geen enkel beding, zolang dit bericht niet bevestigd is door een geldig ondertekend document. The views expressed in this message and any annex are purely those of the writer and may not be regarded as stating an official position of INBO, as long as the message is not confirmed by a duly signed document.

...n the newest R-version (interactions with a dummy variable do not work in gamm). Thanks, Ivy Druk dit bericht a.u.b. niet onnodig af. Please do not print this message unnecessarily. Dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen geven enkel de visie van de schrijver weer en binden het INBO onder geen enkel beding, zolang dit bericht niet bevestigd is door een geldig ondertekend document. The views expressed in this message and any annex are purely those of the writer and may not be regarded as stating an official position of INBO, as long as the message is not confirmed by a duly signed document.

Hi, Some try: > names(mi$xlevels) [1] "f" > all.vars(mi$formula) [1] "D" "x" "f" "Y" > names(mx$xlevels) [1] "f" > all.vars(mx$formula) [1] "D" "x" "f" When offset is indicated out of the formula, it does not work... Marc Le 07/03/2018 ? 06:20, Bendix Carstensen a ?crit?: > I would like

Dear all, I would like to know how can I concatenate 2 data.frames into a single one. Both data frames have the same number of columns and the same class type in each correspondent column. So what I want is to have a new data.frame where I have first the values from one data.frame and then the values from a second data.frame would came after in this new data.frame. Thanks in advance. Med

...ata. ~ Roger Brinner The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data. ~ John Tukey Dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen geven enkel de visie van de schrijver weer en binden het INBO onder geen enkel beding, zolang dit bericht niet bevestigd is door een geldig ondertekend document. The views expressed in this message and any annex are purely those of the writer and may not be regarded as stating an official position of INBO, as long as the message is not confirmed by a duly signed document.

...for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data. ~ John Tukey * * * * * * * * * * * * * D I S C L A I M E R * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen geven enkel de visie van de schrijver weer en binden het INBO onder geen enkel beding, zolang dit bericht niet bevestigd is door een geldig ondertekend document. The views expressed in this message and any annex are purely those of the writer and may not be regarded as stating an official position of INBO, as long as the message is not confirmed by a duly signed document.