search for: be_nil

I am trying the Restful-Authentication (latest version, downloaded today) and upon running the generator, doing the migration, prepping the test system and putting the resources in routes.rb I get a Rspec test failure: ''SessionsController logins and redirects'' FAILED expected not nil, got nil routes.rb has: map.resources :users map.resources :sessions nothing else was

Still new to Specs... How do I create a spec to test a model method? Specifically, here is my spec: #testing model describe User do it "should have many user roles" do User.reflect_on_association(:user_roles).should_not be_nil end it "should have many roles though user roles" do User.reflect_on_association(:roles).should_not be_nil end it "should know what role it has" do #User.should end end The last spec is incomplete... basically, I will want the code to be something like this:...

...------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11:41 /c/work/quizmaker_demo (questions)$ spec spec ...................................c:/work/quizmaker_demo/spec/models/ user_spec.rb:86 User.authenticate(''nonexisting'', ''secret'').should be_nil (rdb:1) s c:/tools/ruby/ruby186/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mocha-0.9.5/lib/mocha/ class_method.rb:40 stubbee.__metaclass__.class_eval("def #{method}(*args, &block); mocha.method_missing(:#{method}, *a (rdb:1) c

Is there any way to do foo.should (be_nil || be_empty) in rspec. Thanks in advance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20081104/ee43c9c9/attachment.html>

how would you check for a range using rspec? person.password.range.should == Range.new(5..40) <- this doesn''t work -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070527/4d8cb007/attachment-0001.html

...dex") should_be_logged_in end it "should logout" do get :logout response.should redirect_to(:controller => "users", :action => "login") should_not_be_logged_in end protected def should_be_logged_in response.session.should_not be_nil session[:user].should_not be_nil end def should_not_be_logged_in response.session.should_not be_nil session[:user].should be_nil end end Unfortunately, the actual method its testing works fine, but my test is getting the following error: "expected redirect to {:action=>...

I''m just getting started with rspec, I''m running on edge for both. In a fresh project, I freeze edge, install the edge rspec plugin. I generate a simple rspec_model and run the spec. It passes. When I run rake spec:doc, I get the following output: - NO NAME (Because of --dry-run) where the specification should be. In fact if I just make a pending spec, it does the same.

Hey, May be it is just too deep night over here and I''m missing something though I got this failure on {{{response.should_not redirect_to}}}: ''QueuesController should allow authenticated user to access ''show'''' FAILED Matcher does not support should_not. See Spec::Matchers for more information about matchers. Also I''ve found this in

...(:all) do @browser = Watir::IE.new @browser.goto "http://localhost:8080/admin_frnPkg_add.html <http://localhost:8080/admin_frnPkg_add.html> " end #begin ## Basic page validation it "should have the logo" do @browser.image(:src, /cp_logo.gif/).should_not be_nil end #logo it "should have login/logout text" do login = @browser.table(:index, 1)[2][1].text login.should =~ (/Log/) end #login/logout after(:all) do @browser.close end #after end #Project name -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubb...

...pcode screencast suggests that model.should have(1).error_on(:attribute) should pass if model.send(:attribute) returns nil For me, I get an exception from the rspec script. My work-around is simple. Instead of: - model.should have(1).error_on(:attribute) I Use: -model.send(:attribute).should be_nil But now I have the question: - What kind of error causes: - model.should have(1).error_on(:attribute) - to pass ?? --b

...:content => "<h1>Oh Hai!</h1><script>", :user_id => @user.id, :format => ''js'' # get json response json = JSON.parse(response.body) json[''html''].should_not be_nil json[''html''].should contain("#{h(''<h1>Oh Hai!</h1><script>'')}") end How would I go about testing this properly? This is the error showing what webrat expected versus what it received: expected the following element...

hello spec''ers, i''m in the hunt for guides on testing controllers with rspec, would you guys recommend any? thanks Oliver -- Oliver Azevedo Barnes oli.azevedo.barnes at gmail.com +55 11 9768 0193 http://www.linkedin.com/in/oliverbarnes http://workingwithrails.com/person/4704-oliver-barnes

...cribe Product, "The Product model" do describe "When a new blank product object gets created" do before(:each) do @product = Product.new end it "should not be valid" do @product.should_not be_valid @product.errors.on(:title).should_not be_nil # plenty other errors to display... end end end -- And here is the error message when I run this spec: -- spec product_spec.rb F 1) ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid in ''Product The Product model When a new blank product object gets created should not be valid'' PGError:...

hi all, i''m learning rspec and i can''t figure out how to test if a callback is executed in a model. my model code is: class User < ActiveRecord::Base before_save :encrypt_password ... def encrypt(password) self.class.encrypt(password, salt) end thanks a lot, cs. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Fyi, I made the following renames: * RailsExample -> RailsExampleGroup * FunctionalExample -> FunctionalExampleGroup * ControllerExample -> ControllerExampleGroup * ViewExample -> ViewExampleGroup * HelperExample -> HelperExampleGroup * ModelExample -> ModelExampleGroup This was done to keep the naming consistent with ExampleGroup.

...pp So I implemented my story and some of the steps are: (...) When "user creates a product" do post "products/new", :name => @name end Then "there should be a product named ''$name''" do |name| Product.find_by_name(name).should_not be_nil end When I run the story i get: (...) When user creates a product Then there should be a product named ''Book'' (PENDING) 1 scenarios: 0 succeeded, 0 failed, 1 pending Pending Steps: 1) Creating a product (success): there should be a product named ''Book''...

Hi, I''m a bit stuck with mocking a unit test of a join model with regards to a validates_uniqueness_of clause. I have class Book < AR:B has_many :clippings various validates_presence_of etc end class Clip < AR:B has_many :clippings various validates_presence_of etc end class Clipping < AR:B belongs_to :book belongs_to :clip validates_uniqueness_of :clip_id,

I appear to have written code which travels backwards through time: http://www.vimeo.com/742590 This disturbs me immensely. If anyone can explain it, that would be cool. I think it''s an illusion brought about by how RSpec wraps the code it executes, and by the sheer weirdness of continuations. -- Giles Bowkett Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com Portfolio:

...our custom magic columns ... end @my_mage = Magik.new @my_mage.save! end it "should set each custom magic column present" do (Magik.column_names & ActiveRecord::Base::HLL_AUDIT_COLUMNS).each do |magic_column| @my_mage.read_attribute(magic_column).should_not be_nil end end I can simply create duplicate separate specification file and set the configuration value appropriately in each. Something along the lines of: describe "Builds a Model with custom magic columns" do before(:all) do config.active_record.default_timezone = nil or co...

...(:all) do @browser = Watir::IE.new @browser.goto "http://localhost:8080/admin_frnPkg_add.html <http://localhost:8080/admin_frnPkg_add.html> " end #begin ## Basic page validation it "should have the logo" do @browser.image(:src, /cp_logo.gif/).should_not be_nil end #logo it "should have login/logout text" do login = @browser.table(:index, 1)[2][1].text login.should =~ (/Log/) end #login/logout after(:all) do @browser.close end #after end #Project name -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubb...