Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "be8".
Did you mean:
2e8
2016 May 18
2
BE8 elf format on gold
Hi Guys ,
We are trying to enable LTO on our code base for clang(3.8) using
gold linker , and we are stuck with below error
bash-4.1$ /arm-install/bin/armeb-linux-gnueabi-ld.gold --be8
/arm-install/bin/armeb-linux-gnueabi-ld.gold: --be8: unknown option
And found that ,Be8 (byte invariant addressing) is not supported in
the gold linker,
Questions is ,how do we go from here ?
Do be8 format is very mandatory for armv7(big endian) ? Or we can
proceed without –be8 option ?...
2016 Oct 28
3
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets
...wesome results!
I'm surprised! LLD is barely working on ARM at the moment. :)
> I wonder if ARM32 BE is a real thing. I know that the processor is
> bi-endian, but is there any system that uses ARM32 in big-endian mode?
Yes... it is "a thing". :)
ARM has two modes: BE32 and BE8 (mixed) and they can be enabled via
CP15 registers.
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0290g/ch06s05s01.html
cheers,
--renato
2016 Oct 28
0
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Richard Pennington via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> With all the talk about using lld on the list, I thought it would be
> interesting to try using it in my clang based ELLCC cross compilation tool
> chain. http://ellcc.org
>
> The change was simple, since I use configuration files to tell clang how
> to compile, where to
2016 Oct 28
1
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets
Well, at least it works on some programs across all arches. That was some
great testing you've done for us. :-)
Thanks!
Renato
On 28 Oct 2016 23:51, "Richard Pennington" <rich at pennware.com> wrote:
> On 10/28/2016 05:27 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
>
>> On 28 October 2016 at 23:02, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking