search for: be8

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "be8".

Did you mean: 2e8
2016 May 18
2
BE8 elf format on gold
Hi Guys , We are trying to enable LTO on our code base for clang(3.8) using gold linker , and we are stuck with below error bash-4.1$ /arm-install/bin/armeb-linux-gnueabi-ld.gold --be8 /arm-install/bin/armeb-linux-gnueabi-ld.gold: --be8: unknown option And found that ,Be8 (byte invariant addressing) is not supported in the gold linker, Questions is ,how do we go from here ? Do be8 format is very mandatory for armv7(big endian) ? Or we can proceed without –be8 option ?...
2016 Oct 28
3
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets
...wesome results! I'm surprised! LLD is barely working on ARM at the moment. :) > I wonder if ARM32 BE is a real thing. I know that the processor is > bi-endian, but is there any system that uses ARM32 in big-endian mode? Yes... it is "a thing". :) ARM has two modes: BE32 and BE8 (mixed) and they can be enabled via CP15 registers. http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0290g/ch06s05s01.html cheers, --renato
2016 Oct 28
0
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Richard Pennington via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > With all the talk about using lld on the list, I thought it would be > interesting to try using it in my clang based ELLCC cross compilation tool > chain. http://ellcc.org > > The change was simple, since I use configuration files to tell clang how > to compile, where to
2016 Oct 28
1
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets
Well, at least it works on some programs across all arches. That was some great testing you've done for us. :-) Thanks! Renato On 28 Oct 2016 23:51, "Richard Pennington" <rich at pennware.com> wrote: > On 10/28/2016 05:27 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > >> On 28 October 2016 at 23:02, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking