search for: be6f

...eing stable enough that using > them isn't more work than necessary.) Maybe we can start the discussion by deciding if we want to use metadata or intrinsics. [1] - http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/doclib/stdxe/2013/composerxe/compiler/cpp-lin/index.htm#GUID-B25ABCC2-BE6F-4599-AEDF-2434F4676E1B.htm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121106/87e75a2b/attachment.html>

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com> >> To: "David Tweed" <david.tweed at gmail.com> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 11:08:23 AM >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Regarding BOF: Vectorization in

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com> > To: "David Tweed" <david.tweed at gmail.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 11:08:23 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Regarding BOF: Vectorization in LLVM > > Hi David! > > On Nov 6, 2012, at 3:23 AM, David Tweed <david.tweed at

Hi Rowland >Hi Marcio, we would need more info, where are you migrating the home folders from ? and where to ? I copied Windows Server 2008 folders and permissions with ROBOCOPY to my Samba 4 server. >I know you mentioned a Win 2008 server, are the home folders stored on that ? The personal folders were stored on it (Windows), but now they are on my new Samba 4 file server. >Another

...DSA object GUID: a1ab021c-0ef7-4fd3-a69d-28afc7c1260a Last attempt @ NTTIME(0) was successful 0 consecutive failure(s). Last success @ NTTIME(0) ==== KCC CONNECTION OBJECTS ==== Connection -- Connection name: 3135cf0d-0109-4a40-be6f-44e1eca5b5d2 Enabled : TRUE Server DNS name : samba4dc1.empresa.com.br Server DN name : CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SAMBA4DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=empresa,DC=com,DC=br TransportType: RPC options: 0...

Hai, ? You can safely ignore?that mesage. ? If both servers are done and running 4.8.? procede to 4.9 ? >> ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' is fixed in later samba versions ? Greetz, ? Louis ? ? ? Van: Marcio Demetrio Bacci [mailto:marciobacci at gmail.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 30 augustus 2019 11:39 Aan: L.P.H. van Belle

...fd3-a69d-28afc7c1260a >>> Last attempt @ NTTIME(0) was successful >>> 0 consecutive failure(s). >>> Last success @ NTTIME(0) >>> >>> ==== KCC CONNECTION OBJECTS ==== >>> >>> Connection -- >>> Connection name: 3135cf0d-0109-4a40-be6f-44e1eca5b5d2 >>> Enabled : TRUE >>> Server DNS name : samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br >>> Server DN name : CN=NTDS >>> Settings,CN=SAMBA4-DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=empresa,DC=com,DC=br >>> TransportType: RPC...

Situation: Trying to upgrade Samba from 4.1 to 4.5 without disruption too much by adding new DCs and demoting old ones. After bringing online the first 4.5 DC, I ran `demote --remove-other-dead-server=` on that DC to remove one of the old 4.1 DCs (held no FSMO roles). That seemed to run fine (the DC had been offline for a few weeks at that point and I didn't want to restore it just for