Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "bdff".
Did you mean:
bdf
2015 Jul 27
2
PJSIP T.38 issues
...bKPjba38816d-b5fe-4d5f-8bda-d0968e3
8e5f1
From: "SysNux"
<sip:+68940XXXXXX at 192.168.0.200>;tag=22d8369f-061d-4232-9c4d-5068e81bc5c
5
To: <sip:40ZZZZZZ at gw.sysnux.pf>
Contact: <sip:63035284-ad7d-484f-8e54-f5ea54f39104 at 192.168.0.200:5060>
Call-ID: 57283616-94e0-4052-bdff-491b31fdd229
CSeq: 31693 INVITE
Allow: OPTIONS, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL,
UPDATE, PRACK, MESSAGE, REGISTER, REFER
Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces, norefersub
Session-Expires: 1800
Min-SE: 90
Max-Forwards: 70
User-Agent: Asterisk GPL PBX
Content-Type: application/sdp
C...
2014 May 28
0
Sharing Rails 4 session with a Rails 4.1 App
...il to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/7200970e-3b2f-4099-bdff-b6593bb3a59f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
2004 Sep 14
1
start error "invalid interface" on shorewall 2.08
...fe80::20e:2eff:fe0f:898c/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
6: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:30:bd:2e:85:55 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.0.100/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth1
inet6 fe80::230:bdff:fe2e:8555/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
7: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:c0:4f:8b:03:24 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.202.1/24 brd 192.168.202.255 scope global eth2
inet6 fe80::2c0:4fff:fe8b:32...
2012 Oct 11
3
Joining Samba RODC, NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED
...ising global parameters
params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf"
Processing section "[global]"
WARNING: The "idmap uid" option is deprecated
WARNING: The "idmap gid" option is deprecated
added interface eth9.102 ip=fe80::20c:bdff:fe05:28f8%eth9.102
bcast=fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff%eth9.102 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
added interface eth1 ip=fe80::290:bff:fe21:43ac%eth1
bcast=fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff%eth1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
added interface eth2 ip=fe80::290:bff:fe21:43ad%eth2
bcast=fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff%eth2...
2004 Sep 15
15
re: start error
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The original post was over 300,000kb so I didn''t spam the list with it -TE.
|
|
| Thank you for your quick and helpful response.
|
| I didn''t understand that the virtual interface eth0:1 doesn''t count as
a separate instance from eth0.
| I am sorry to ask for further assistance and would appreciate any
help. The error
2005 Apr 22
4
I have a problem similar to FAQ 2 scenario, but reply packets don''t seem to be recognized.
...71.16.82.91/28 brd 71.16.82.95 scope global secondary eth3:V91
inet 71.16.82.92/28 brd 71.16.82.95 scope global secondary eth3:V92
inet 71.16.82.93/28 brd 71.16.82.95 scope global secondary eth3:V93
inet 71.16.82.94/28 brd 71.16.82.95 scope global secondary eth3:V94
inet6 fe80::230:bdff:feb5:245f/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
6: sit0: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noqueue
link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
My ip route show output is as follows:
71.16.82.80/28 dev eth3 scope link src 71.16.82.93
65.40.217.0/24 dev eth1 scope link src 65.40.217...
2005 Feb 01
4
Shorewall problem
...0:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,NOTRAILERS,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
qlen 1000
link/ether 00:30:bd:6a:f2:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.0.0.8/24 brd 255.255.255.255 scope global eth0
inet6 fe80::230:bdff:fe6a:f2d3/64 scope link
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0d:87:71:4f:b6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.1.1/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth1
inet6 fe80::20d:87ff:fe71:4fb6/64 scope link
4: sit0@NONE: <NOARP> mtu 148...