search for: bd4f3c222904

...ister_mutex); - /* RFC-TODO: maybe we should check if there are open sockets - * assigned to that transport and avoid the unregistration - */ if (transport_h2g == t) transport_h2g = NULL; diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c index 94e6fc905a77..bd4f3c222904 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c @@ -857,6 +857,7 @@ int hvs_notify_send_post_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, ssize_t written, static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = { .features = VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_G2H, + .module...

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using