Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "bd331844".
2019 Sep 09
2
[RFC] changing variable naming rules
...pect that
> worries me the most.
>
How large is a typical patch to merge that is backported from the next
major release to a previous dot release?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190909/bd331844/attachment.html>
2019 Sep 06
3
[RFC] changing variable naming rules
Personally I think the benefit-cost ratio is quite low here, and changing the rules would bring little value to me.
Maybe I just don’t see that much benefits of changing the naming rules, having got used to the current naming scheme after a few years with LLVM.
I'm a little bit curious to hear more about the experiences from the changes in LLD.
I’m thinking about things like:
- ongoing