search for: bd331844

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "bd331844".

2019 Sep 09
2
[RFC] changing variable naming rules
...pect that > worries me the most. > How large is a typical patch to merge that is backported from the next major release to a previous dot release? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190909/bd331844/attachment.html>
2019 Sep 06
3
[RFC] changing variable naming rules
Personally I think the benefit-cost ratio is quite low here, and changing the rules would bring little value to me. Maybe I just don’t see that much benefits of changing the naming rules, having got used to the current naming scheme after a few years with LLVM. I'm a little bit curious to hear more about the experiences from the changes in LLD. I’m thinking about things like: - ongoing