Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bd0eoqq9bdkepq".
2019 Jul 16
2
Unexpected result from LIST EXTENDED command
I am executing this command below to dovecot-2.3.5-6.cp1178.x86_64 server
Notice that some status responses are missing (For folders INBOX.Archive, INBOX.spam.&-BD0EOQQ9BDkEPQ-). I wonder If this is a bug or working as expected
In rfc5819 there is this:
If the server runs into unexpected problems while trying to look up
the STATUS information, it MAY drop the corresponding STATUS reply.
In such a situation, the LIST command would still return a tagged OK
reply.
May be...
2019 Jul 16
2
Unexpected result from LIST EXTENDED command
...ommand
On 16 Jul 2019, at 9.51, Emil Kalchev via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org<mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote:
I am executing this command below to dovecot-2.3.5-6.cp1178.x86_64 server
Notice that some status responses are missing (For folders INBOX.Archive, INBOX.spam.&-BD0EOQQ9BDkEPQ-). I wonder If this is a bug or working as expected
In rfc5819 there is this:
If the server runs into unexpected problems while trying to look up
the STATUS information, it MAY drop the corresponding STATUS reply.
In such a situation, the LIST command would still return a tagged OK
reply.
May be...
2019 Jul 16
0
Unexpected result from LIST EXTENDED command
On 16 Jul 2019, at 9.51, Emil Kalchev via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> I am executing this command below to dovecot-2.3.5-6.cp1178.x86_64 server
>
> Notice that some status responses are missing (For folders INBOX.Archive, INBOX.spam.&-BD0EOQQ9BDkEPQ-). I wonder If this is a bug or working as expected
>
> In rfc5819 there is this:
>
> If the server runs into unexpected problems while trying to look up
> the STATUS information, it MAY drop the corresponding STATUS reply.
> In such a situation, the LIST command would still r...