search for: bcso

Hi, I wanted to know whats the ideal way to install puppet client ie the below packages on Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike) system -- 2.4.20-8smp I get the dependencies issue with the below(bcso they are for RHEL4 which is 2.6 kernel). What would be an ideal way, where can I get the tar source of the compatible version of puppet/facter/ruby for Redhat 9 facter-1.3.7-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm puppet-0.23.2-1.el4.i386.rpm ruby-1.8.1-7.EL4.8.i386.rpm ruby-libs-1.8.1-7.EL4.8.i386.rpm...

...important to my project feature: to link against bitcode > "shared objects". The semantics is pretty simple. The module treated as > shared object is only used as the source of symbol names which be > excluded from the list unresolved symbols. In summary, linking foo.bc and bar.bcso (do you use a different extension to differentiate from a "static" bc?) would be equivalent (but faster, easier) to $ llc bar.bc -filetype=obj -o bar.o $ clang -shared -o bar.so bar.o $ clang -use-gold-plugin foo.o bar.so -o t Is that correct? In particular, "lld t" should sho...

Hi llvm team! I'm currently working on the extended version of llvm-ld, which has an ability to check if all the symbols present (and fail if some symbols are not resolved), treat archives in the right way (link all the object files in the archive if it's specified as the regular input, not as -l) and the most important to my project feature: to link against bitcode "shared

...feature: to link against bitcode > > "shared objects". The semantics is pretty simple. The module treated as > > shared object is only used as the source of symbol names which be > > excluded from the list unresolved symbols. > > In summary, linking foo.bc and bar.bcso (do you use a different > extension to differentiate from a "static" bc?) would be equivalent (but > faster, easier) to > > $ llc bar.bc -filetype=obj -o bar.o > $ clang -shared -o bar.so bar.o > $ clang -use-gold-plugin foo.o bar.so -o t > > Is that correct? In pa...