search for: bcpl

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, l l wrote: > 2006/8/17, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: >> LLVM is written primarily in C++, for a variety of reasons, > Hi, > > Please give me one reason, ok, I like BCPL comments. > Btw, emacs is fine with lisp, c and eclipse is fine with Java. > That was interesting fact to me. Please stop, this is totally off-topic for this list. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

I appeal to those entrusted with the keeping of the R flame, the S flame, and the S-Plus flame to relate a bit of history. How did S, S-Plus, and R get their names? Going from S to S-Plus appears clear, a commercial company purchased rights to S, developed a product that they wanted to indicate was related to S, but was more fully developed. This leaves me with only a rumor how S got its original

Ashlee Vance's article on R in the New York Times. This is typical of the New York Times. Because they get to coast on the prestige and reputation of their brand , they have a history of just this sort of journalistic sloppiness. Whether it's the author or the editor at fault doesn't really matter, they do this screw-up all the time. Look, if you write an article on the first page of

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, l l wrote: > sorry, just hit the enter key by accident. > Anyway, why was llvm was written in c++? > > c and python, c and ocaml, c and java i would more prefer. > > I am not a flamethrower(sorry again if it was.) Just another newbie. If you want to write a new compiler, you're free to do it in a language of your choice. LLVM is written primarily in

2006/8/17, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > LLVM is written primarily in C++, for a variety of reasons, Hi, Please give me one reason, Btw, emacs is fine with lisp, c and eclipse is fine with Java. That was interesting fact to me.

Am 04.02.2016 um 14:46 schrieb Roland Mainz: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Christian Mauderer > <christian.mauderer at embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> I am searching a SSH server for remote administration of an embedded >> application running on RTEMS (https://www.rtems.org). This environment >> has neither virtual memory nor user and kernel space. So this is like

Hello list, Is there any way to perform a block comment in R? In C++, anything in between a /* and */ is considered a comment, and it allows programmers to comment out chunks of code for testing and debugging. Is there such a feature in R? Cheers, Wee-Jin

...il.com > >wrote: > > > ...The user interface for R, otherwise known as the S programming > language > > has the same origins as C and Unix.... > > > We could take this one step further, and note that C's design (its "user > interface"?) was based on BCPL, which was developed at Cambridge University > and MIT (which was in turn loosely based on CPL). But BCPL declined into > obscurity, while we're still stuck witxxx benefitting from C. > > As for Unix, most of its ideas came from Multics (developed mostly at MIT, > but with Bell...