search for: bc81104e

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:20 PM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 7:30 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > >> I believe this will report an error on more command-lines than a >> traditional linker would fail to link. E.g.: >> ld.lld foo.o A.a B.a A.a B.a >> That "should" work fine if the libs are

...Ahh, that's true. I don't think that's a serious issue, but that's indeed something that this feature would report as a false positive. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180405/bc81104e/attachment.html>

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 7:30 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > I believe this will report an error on more command-lines than a > traditional linker would fail to link. E.g.: > ld.lld foo.o A.a B.a A.a B.a > That "should" work fine if the libs are circularly-dependent, as long as > there's only a 1-level cycle. I've seen that sort of