Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "bbrank".
Did you mean:
bbrand
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Naryreassociate vs reassociate
...ociate.
>
>
> The simple way to fix this is to mark which operands it's paired
> together in the past, and always try to pair the same ones together if
> it can, regardless of rank.
Or simply adjust the ranks of paired operands to be the same and
different from all other ranks
(BBrank is << 16, so you should have room do to this)
2015 May 05
1
[LLVMdev] Naryreassociate vs reassociate
...which operands it's paired
>> > together in the past, and always try to pair the same ones together if
>> > it can, regardless of rank.
>>
>> Or simply adjust the ranks of paired operands to be the same and
>> different from all other ranks
>>
>> (BBrank is << 16, so you should have room do to this)
2015 May 05
1
[LLVMdev] Naryreassociate vs reassociate
...way to fix this is to mark which operands it's paired
> > together in the past, and always try to pair the same ones together if
> > it can, regardless of rank.
>
> Or simply adjust the ranks of paired operands to be the same and
> different from all other ranks
>
> (BBrank is << 16, so you should have room do to this)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150505/f07cb7d4/attachment.html>
2015 May 05
1
[LLVMdev] Naryreassociate vs reassociate
...>> > together in the past, and always try to pair the same ones together if
> >> > it can, regardless of rank.
> >>
> >> Or simply adjust the ranks of paired operands to be the same and
> >> different from all other ranks
> >>
> >> (BBrank is << 16, so you should have room do to this)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150505/d10900a7/attachment.html>