Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bb_uniqu".
Did you mean:
bb_unique
2010 Oct 11
3
[LLVMdev] Specify dominator for BasicBlock to avoid "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
Hi,
I am working on a pass aimed to unify multiple exits of a loop into a unique
basic block. The approach is straight forward:
I create a unique BasicBlock BB_unique that has as predecessors all the exit
blocks of the loop, it contains a phi instruction and a switch to redirect
the flow correctly. Additionally, for each initial exit block I create an
associated block that will jump to the original successors of the exit
block.
In short:
B1 B2 B3...
2010 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Specify dominator for BasicBlock to avoid "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Xinfinity wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a pass aimed to unify multiple exits of a loop into a unique
> basic block. The approach is straight forward:
> I create a unique BasicBlock BB_unique that has as predecessors all the exit
> blocks of the loop, it contains a phi instruction and a switch to redirect
> the flow correctly. Additionally, for each initial exit block I create an
> associated block that will jump to the original successors of the exit
> block.
> In short...
2010 Oct 12
1
[LLVMdev] Specify dominator for BasicBlock to avoid "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
Hi, I tried adding the PHI nodes in BB_unique, and it works for the simple
case described here, but in case the nodes were declared in some
predecessors of ExitBB1 and used in ExitBB1_redirect and its successors, it
won't work, unless I create entries for all of them in BB_unique.
B1 (declares PHI_1) B3
|...