search for: bb_uniqu

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bb_uniqu".

Did you mean: bb_unique
2010 Oct 11
3
[LLVMdev] Specify dominator for BasicBlock to avoid "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
Hi, I am working on a pass aimed to unify multiple exits of a loop into a unique basic block. The approach is straight forward: I create a unique BasicBlock BB_unique that has as predecessors all the exit blocks of the loop, it contains a phi instruction and a switch to redirect the flow correctly. Additionally, for each initial exit block I create an associated block that will jump to the original successors of the exit block. In short: B1 B2 B3...
2010 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Specify dominator for BasicBlock to avoid "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Xinfinity wrote: > > Hi, > > I am working on a pass aimed to unify multiple exits of a loop into a unique > basic block. The approach is straight forward: > I create a unique BasicBlock BB_unique that has as predecessors all the exit > blocks of the loop, it contains a phi instruction and a switch to redirect > the flow correctly. Additionally, for each initial exit block I create an > associated block that will jump to the original successors of the exit > block. > In short...
2010 Oct 12
1
[LLVMdev] Specify dominator for BasicBlock to avoid "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
Hi, I tried adding the PHI nodes in BB_unique, and it works for the simple case described here, but in case the nodes were declared in some predecessors of ExitBB1 and used in ExitBB1_redirect and its successors, it won't work, unless I create entries for all of them in BB_unique. B1 (declares PHI_1) B3 |...