search for: bb_clone1

...no: If I add the cloned basic block (bb1_clone) into the same function at a place such that all paths to bb1_clone from the entry are the same as the earlier paths to bb1 (except that I am now removing an earlier path to bb1 from one of its predecessor), would repatching the unnamed temporaries in bb_clone1 to the new ones (local to the cloned block ?) in the client transform pass be good enough to result in a well formed LLVM IR representation ? Thanks much for your time. - Prakash