search for: bb408

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "bb408".

Did you mean: bb108
2006 Dec 04
2
[LLVMdev] problem using scc_iterator on CallGraph
...: ; preds = %entry ret void bb: ; preds = %bb688 switch int 0, label %bb684 [ int 33, label %bb412 int 35, label %bb604 int 37, label %bb531 int 38, label %bb418 int 42, label %bb495 int 43, label %bb467 int 45, label %cond_true484 int 47, label %bb510 int 48, label %bb408 int 49, label %bb410 int 60, label %bb620 int 61, label %bb588 int 62, label %bb652 int 65, label %bb4 int 66, label %bb17 int 67, label %bb67 int 68, label %bb113 int 74, label %bb20 int 75, label %cond_false129 int 76, label %bb132 int 77, label %bb145 int 7...
2006 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] problem using scc_iterator on CallGraph
...88 > switch int 0, label %bb684 [ > int 33, label %bb412 > int 35, label %bb604 > int 37, label %bb531 > int 38, label %bb418 > int 42, label %bb495 > int 43, label %bb467 > int 45, label %cond_true484 > int 47, label %bb510 > int 48, label %bb408 > int 49, label %bb410 > int 60, label %bb620 > int 61, label %bb588 > int 62, label %bb652 > int 65, label %bb4 > int 66, label %bb17 > int 67, label %bb67 > int 68, label %bb113 > int 74, label %bb20 > int 75, label %cond_false129 >...
2006 Dec 04
1
[LLVMdev] problem using scc_iterator on CallGraph
...l %bb684 [ >> int 33, label %bb412 >> int 35, label %bb604 >> int 37, label %bb531 >> int 38, label %bb418 >> int 42, label %bb495 >> int 43, label %bb467 >> int 45, label %cond_true484 >> int 47, label %bb510 >> int 48, label %bb408 >> int 49, label %bb410 >> int 60, label %bb620 >> int 61, label %bb588 >> int 62, label %bb652 >> int 65, label %bb4 >> int 66, label %bb17 >> int 67, label %bb67 >> int 68, label %bb113 >> int 74, label %bb20 >> int 7...
2007 Sep 07
1
[LLVMdev] Call instruction
...when the call includes a use with a kill of some register and also an implicit def of that register? Is the register to be considered live out at that point? I've found a failing testcase where register scavenging complains about redefining a live register. The (ARM) code looks like this: bb408: 0x9b07468, LLVM BB @0x9ae9010, ID#8: Live Ins: %r4 %r5 %r7 Predecessors according to CFG: 0x9b08398 (#71) STR %r4<kill>, %sp, %NOREG, 0, 14, %NOREG %r4 = MOVi 0, 14, %NOREG, %NOREG %r0 = MOVr %r7<kill>, 14, %NOREG, %NOREG %r1 = MOVr %r5<kill>, 14, %NOREG, %NOREG %r2 = LD...