Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "bazinet".
2006 Feb 16
2
Joel on Software Rails Rant
I didn''t know if any of you had seen this rant about Rails over on Joel on
Software but it is an interesting read. Check it out here -
http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?joel.3.309321.45
-Rob Bazinet
http://www.robertbazinet.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060216/2de429f5/attachment.html
2006 Aug 11
7
Online Course
Is there anyone insterested in taking an online course which covers
"Ruby on Rails" (introductory level)?
Thanks
thuycis
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2006 Feb 17
7
FCGI hanging w/ lighttpd and RoR 1.0 (need to kill -9)
Hi, everyone,
I''m currently running a Rails 1.0 project using lighttpd-1.4.9 behind
Apache 2 on RHEL 3. My fcgi process (I''m only using one right now)
always hangs after some time, which is something I haven''t experienced
before (e.g., I''ve run this same app. on a TextDrive account and it
works fine there).
So ... any ideas on what could be causing this?
2012 Mar 01
2
Another ? about Speex and CPU
...rming 1.49 DMIPS / MHz
? Up to 91 DMIPS Running at 66 MHz from Flash (1 Wait-State)
? Up to 49 DMIPS Running at 33 MHz from Flash (0 Wait-State)
Or
An ARM7TDMI core running at ~50Mhz for a narrow band 8Kbps sampling rate?
I need to know this before I get deeper into Speex.
Thanks a lot!
Dominic Bazinet
2006 Jul 31
17
Ruby on Snails
I''ve been reading, hearing, and looking at blogs that state Ruby on
Rails is rather slow. Coming from a VB 6 world (thank you Microsoft for
killing VB because VB.NET is NOT VB) I was always told that VB was a toy
or too slow. Now, I''ll easily tell you that yes VB was not a great
language. It had it''s share of warts, like a lot of other languages I
might add, but
2012 Mar 01
0
Another ? about Speex and CPU
...d be very
> close to the achievable limit (couldn't say on which side). So if your
> AVR32 is faster than an ARM7TDMI, it's likely achievable. If it's
> slower, then it's likely not achievable.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Jean-Marc
>
> On 12-02-29 10:21 PM, dbazinet at sunex.ca wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am interested to use Speex but need to know If I can use it under
>> our project's constraint. We need to use a low cost micro controller
>> on a very small PCB. This means there's no space for an external DSP
>> unit....
2012 Mar 01
1
Another ? about Speex and CPU
...ler and some hand-coded assembly, you would be very
close to the achievable limit (couldn't say on which side). So if your
AVR32 is faster than an ARM7TDMI, it's likely achievable. If it's
slower, then it's likely not achievable.
Hope that helps,
Jean-Marc
On 12-02-29 10:21 PM, dbazinet at sunex.ca wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am interested to use Speex but need to know If I can use it under
> our project's constraint. We need to use a low cost micro controller
> on a very small PCB. This means there's no space for an external DSP
> unit.
>
> Can s...
2006 Feb 14
5
Radrails - Quick (if misplaced?) question...
My apologies if this is the wrong place for this but...it should be really simple.
When I use a Generator in Radrails, nothing happens. I (believe) I have properly set the path to Ruby and still nothing. And, it doesn''t seem there is an error log to further diagnose what is happening.
I am using 0.5.3 on Windows. Am I missing something obvious?
As a P.S., is anyone particularly fond of
2008 Jul 01
8
InstantRails
Does anyone know if InstantRails will be upgraded for Rails 2.1? I see
a lot of threads where people are discussing problems upgrading from 2.0
to 2.1. I would rather wait for InstantRails2.1 if it was close?
Thanks.
Bharat
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups