search for: baz2

...t don't meet the selection criteria, regardless of whether they have a child that does. The violation is visible when reproducing example #9 from Section 5 [0]: $ env -i USER=user HOME=/dev/shm/dovecot-test/user PATH=/usr/bin:/bin \ doveadm -c /tmp/dovecot.conf mailbox create foo2 baz2 $ env -i USER=user HOME=/dev/shm/dovecot-test/user PATH=/usr/bin:/bin \ doveadm -c /tmp/dovecot.conf mailbox create -s \ foo2/{bar1,bar2} baz2/{bar2,bar22,bar222} eps2 eps2/mamba qux2/bar2 $ env -i USER=user HOME=/dev/shm/dovecot-test/user PATH=/usr/bin:/bin \ do...

...ld)=bar) same => n, Hangup() exten => h,1,Verbose(0,Entering context ${CONTEXT} from ${CHANNEL(channeltype)} channel ${CHANNEL} with EXTEN and CID set to ${EXTEN} and ${CALLERID(num)}) same => n, ExecIf($["x${CHANNEL(channeltype)}"="xLocal"]?Set(CDR(userfield)=baz1:baz2) My goal is to get either baz1 or baz2 value in /var/log/asterisk/cdr-csv/Master.csv. Typing channel originate Local/7005 at from-foobar application Playback tt-monkeys, I can see that the line with ExecIf is run but CDR still contains foo value (the one set before Dial). The strange thing is : 1...

...type: code - name: bar2 type: code - name: baz.o content: defined-atoms: - name: baz scope: global type: code - name: baz2 type: code ... # CHECK: name: foo # CHECK-NOT: undefined-atoms: # CHECK: name: bar # CHECK: name: bar2 # CHECK-NOT: name: baz # CHECK: ... My thinking is that we can extend this to support embedded COFF/ELF/MachO in yaml by...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13364 Bug ID: 13364 Summary: rsyncd clips trims relative symlinks outside of source tree Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

...pe: code > > - name: bar2 > type: code > > - name: baz.o > content: > defined-atoms: > - name: baz > scope: global > type: code > > - name: baz2 > type: code > ... > > # CHECK: name: foo > # CHECK-NOT: undefined-atoms: > # CHECK: name: bar > # CHECK: name: bar2 > # CHECK-NOT: name: baz > # CHECK: ... > > My thinking is that we can extend thi...

...could work but I need a way to silence the warnings out of the -v listing. Shortening the rsyncd "path=" so that the links become inside the tree could work but rsync has no usable way to specify only one directory without causing the links to be considered outside outside the tree. cd baz2; rsync ./ rsync://.../baz1/ # original case rsync bar2/ rsync://.../root/bar1/ # shortened path= Links going to bar1 accessible by /root/ are considered outside of the bar1 tree and clipped. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Hi, I am using the NLSY79 data (longitudinal data from the Bureau of labour stats in the US). The extractor exctracts this data in a "wide" format and I need to reshape it into a long format. What I am doing right now is to do it in chuncks for each and evry variable that is varying and then I merge the data together. This is taking a long time. my question is: How do I specify that

> To better understand how a client would use YAML I/O. I've completely rewritten the ReaderYAML and WriterYAML in lld to use YAML I/O. The source code is now about half the size. But more importantly, the error checking is much, much better and any time an attribute (e.g. of an Atom) is changed or added, there is just one place to update the yaml code instead of two places (the reader

On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > On Oct 22, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Sean Silva wrote: >> Hey Nick, what's the status on YAML IO? The other thread seems to have died. > > I'm waiting on Michael Spencer's feedback. To better understand how a client would use YAML I/O. I've completely rewritten the ReaderYAML and WriterYAML in lld to use YAML I/O. The

...: code >> >> - name: baz.o >> content: >> defined-atoms: >> - name: baz >> scope: global >> type: code >> >> - name: baz2 >> type: code >> ... >> >> # CHECK: name: foo >> # CHECK-NOT: undefined-atoms: >> # CHECK: name: bar >> # CHECK: name: bar2 >> # CHECK-NOT: name: baz >> # CHECK: ... >...

I'm trying to figure out how exactly v2.0 should be parsing configuration files. The most annoying part is if it should always just "use whatever comes first in config" or try some kind of a "use most specific rule". The "most specific" kind of makes more sense initially, but then you start wondering how to handle e.g.: 1) User logs in to imap from 192.168.0.1.