Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "battery_max".
2014 Jun 03
2
Tripp Lite SMART3000RM2U (protocol 3003) running time and charge?
...that's better than
> >> nothing.
> >
> > Yes, the V_interval[] being exposed is a very good idea and does seem
> > the only sensible workaround.
>
> As of the latest push (rev 0d1e017), the tripplite_usb driver
> (v0.22) now reads the battery_min and battery_max variables from
> ups.conf at startup.
Great, many thanks. I have pulled tripplite_usb.c only (with the rest
as provided by Gentoo, meaning version 2.7.1) but the result ends up
reading incorrect values:
0.050452 Setting 'battery_min' to 1e+01
0.050472 Setting 'batte...
2014 Jun 01
0
Tripp Lite SMART3000RM2U (protocol 3003) running time and charge?
...psc when the battery is fully charged, so that's better than
>> nothing.
>
> Yes, the V_interval[] being exposed is a very good idea and does seem
> the only sensible workaround.
As of the latest push (rev 0d1e017), the tripplite_usb driver (v0.22) now reads the battery_min and battery_max variables from ups.conf at startup.
Testing on my OMNIVS1000, the voltage difference between OB and OL is significant, so aside from having two sets of min/max ranges, I'd say calibrate it on the discharge side of the slope, and don't put too much stock in the battery.charge value when it...
2014 Jun 03
0
Tripp Lite SMART3000RM2U (protocol 3003) running time and charge?
...than
>>>> nothing.
>>>
>>> Yes, the V_interval[] being exposed is a very good idea and does seem
>>> the only sensible workaround.
>>
>> As of the latest push (rev 0d1e017), the tripplite_usb driver
>> (v0.22) now reads the battery_min and battery_max variables from
>> ups.conf at startup.
>
> Great, many thanks. I have pulled tripplite_usb.c only (with the rest
> as provided by Gentoo, meaning version 2.7.1) but the result ends up
> reading incorrect values:
>
> 0.050452 Setting 'battery_min' to 1e+01
&g...
2014 May 24
3
Tripp Lite SMART3000RM2U (protocol 3003) running time and charge?
Hello,
At 09:24 -0400 on 2014-5-23 Charles Lepple wrote:
>
> See attached. Still doesn't have the writable V_interval values,
> but I probably won't have time to test that until later.
Thank you for the patch.
> Don't worry about the battery physical properties for now - the
> problem there is that we don't have enough information from the UPS
> to do a