search for: batguano999

Hi With 32-bit Xubuntu-14.04. When I compile FFmpeg from git using speex-1.2rc1 it builds OK. When I compile FFmpeg from git using speex-git it fails to build. (speex-HEAD-78cce67) It's not a big deal, I don't mind using speex-1.2rc1. But am I doing something wrong or is there something wrong with speex-git? (I've put the details in a txt attachment to keep this email post

Hi, On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:58 PM, batguano999 <batguano999 at zoho.com> wrote: > > Hi > With 32-bit Xubuntu-14.04. > When I compile FFmpeg from git using speex-1.2rc1 it builds OK. > When I compile FFmpeg from git using speex-git it fails to build. > (speex-HEAD-78cce67) > > It's not a big deal, I don't m...

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 06:24:48PM -0400, Tristan Matthews wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:58 PM, batguano999 <batguano999 at zoho.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi > > With 32-bit Xubuntu-14.04. > > When I compile FFmpeg from git using speex-1.2rc1 it builds OK. > > When I compile FFmpeg from git using speex-git it fails to build. > > (speex-HEAD-78cce67) > > &gt...

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:53 PM, bat guano <batguano999 at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Google says it's maybe something to do with the "linking process" which > might be caused by the gcc compiler. > > Can something be done with the opus code to overcome this, or shall I > compile on a different/better...

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:28 PM, bat guano <batguano999 at hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>I think you're missing -lm (the math library) when linking. There are some LIBM related changes in the git history >>so this might have already been solved since 0.1.7 >> > Hi > opus-tools-0.1.7 has compiled OK now with Peppermint Thr...

...and amrnb have a function called preemphasis(). In the short term, your options are: 1) Not building statically 2) Renaming that function in the Opus code 3) Renaming that function in the amrnb code I can do the rename for the next version of libopus. Cheers, Jean-Marc On 11/13/2013 05:51 PM, batguano999 wrote: > > Hi > Any idea what's causing these errors:- > > /home/user/build/lib/libopencore-amrnb.a(preemph.o): In function `preemphasis': > /home/user/build/opencore-amr-0.1.3/amrnb/../opencore/codecs_v2/audio/gsm_amr/amr_nb/dec/src/preemph.cpp:193: multiple definition...

> >I can do the rename for the next version of libopus. > Thanks Jean-Marc I will stay with opus-1.1-beta for now and keep watch on opus-git summary to see if/when the rename appears. :-)

Git should work for you now. Jean-Marc On 11/13/2013 06:21 PM, batguano999 wrote: >> >> I can do the rename for the next version of libopus. >> > Thanks Jean-Marc > I will stay with opus-1.1-beta for now and keep watch on opus-git summary to see if/when the rename appears. > :-) > >

Hi I think the gits have gone belly up... @xubuntu:~$ git clone git://git.xiph.org/opus.git Cloning into 'opus'... fatal: read error: Connection reset by peer @xubuntu:~$ git clone git at git.xiph.org:/opus.git Cloning into 'opus'... Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly

Is there still a problem? Several people reported trouble, but by the time I went to check, everything seemed to be working normally. Monty On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:24 PM, bat guano <batguano999 at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi > I think the gits have gone belly up... > > @xubuntu:~$ git clone git://git.xiph.org/opus.git > Cloning into 'opus'... > fatal: read error: Connection reset by peer > > @xubuntu:~$ git clone git at git.xiph.org:/opus.git > Cloning i...

Hi Any idea what's causing these errors:- /home/user/build/lib/libopencore-amrnb.a(preemph.o): In function `preemphasis': /home/user/build/opencore-amr-0.1.3/amrnb/../opencore/codecs_v2/audio/gsm_amr/amr_nb/dec/src/preemph.cpp:193: multiple definition of `preemphasis' /home/user/build/lib/libopus.a(celt_encoder.o):/home/user/build/opus/celt/celt_encoder.c:455: first defined here

Hi I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to compile OK. I've tried with opus-1.0.3 and opus-1.1-beta. The errors are like this:- "undefined reference to `sqrtf'" etc. This OS is Peppermint Three, similar to Ubuntu 12.04. It uses:- gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 Google says it's maybe something to do

Please do a link time test instead... The test case below... Hi I am not a programmer/developer. Much more info needed.

Hi Please fix it so that opus-tools from git can be cross-compiled with mingw. Look here ---> http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/2012-October/001800.html

> > > Google says it's maybe something to do with the "linking process" which might be caused by the gcc compiler. > Can something be done with the opus code to overcome this, or shall I compile on a different/better/newer OS? > > Hello again. Today I've compiled opus-tools-0.1.7 with opus-1.1-beta on two other Ubuntu systems without problems.

> >I think you're missing -lm (the math library) when linking. There are some LIBM related changes in the git history >so this might have already been solved since 0.1.7 > Hi opus-tools-0.1.7 has compiled OK now with Peppermint Three OS... with this configure:- ./configure LIBS=-lm ? :-) ----> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=Vj6KCW3X But I don't think this has been fixed in

> > Bat, can you post your configure invocation command line, the output of > 'pkgconfig --libs opus' and pastebin your config.log somewhere, please? > > The failed line with 'make V=1' is also helpful in debugging. > > -r > Hi This is the config line used for both 0.1.6 and 0.1.7 test builds:- ./configure --disable-dependency-tracking And 'pkg-config

> > How did you compile libopus? Like this... $ wget http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/opus/opus-1.1-beta.tar.gz $ tar -xf opus-1.1-beta.tar.gz $ cd opus-1.1-beta $ ./configure --disable-shared $ make && sudo make install

Hi When we compile opus and opus-tools from git they seem to be version unknown. Is this an oversight - or is it a 'feature'? How about giving them versions like this:- 1.1-git and 0.1.7-git Or even incorporate the commit. version-git-commit When opus is compiled now from git, opus-tools complains because it's not v1.1. And when opus-tools is compiled now from git, it shows as

"unknown" usually means this > script failed to extract a version for some reason (couldn't run git, or > your git version was too old). "script failed to extract a version" Yes, failed to extract a version. But I'm not going to re-compile git. @ubuntu:~$ git --version git version 1.7.4.1 I will use opus_1.1-beta and opus-tools_0.1.7 "tar.gz"