search for: basicis

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "basicis".

Did you mean: basic_s
2017 Apr 12
3
bind vs. bind-chroot
Hi, On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot. On my Slackware servers, I have a rather Keep-It-Simple approach to all things security, e. g. run no unneed services, open only needed ports etc. but I don't run the extra
2017 Apr 12
0
bind vs. bind-chroot
On 4/12/2017 3:11 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a > preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the > effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot. On > my Slackware servers, I have a rather Keep-It-Simple approach to all > things security, e. g. run no unneed
1998 Jul 15
0
Re: RedHat 5.X Security Book
...wat you are using the book for..I myself have been trying for a long time to find a document that describes basic RedHat and Linux security, what to look for, inherent dangers etc etc. So I was overjoyed when I found this book. No, I am not depending on it as a sole source of information, but the basicis that it covers simply do not get repeatadly posted to the lists you mentioned, at least not that I have seen. I think it is a wonderful intro into system security, but it should be made clear that it is not intended as a "fix-all". Just my two cents. -- Jason Welman -----Original Mess...
2017 Apr 13
4
bind vs. bind-chroot
On 04/12/2017 06:18 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/12/2017 3:11 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a >> preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the >> effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot. On >> my Slackware servers, I have a rather