search for: basic_ctdb_configur

Could I impose upon someone to provide some guidance? Some hint? Thank you Is a shared file system actually required? If etcd is used to manage the global recovery lock, is there any need at that point for a shared file system? In other words, are there samba or CTDB files (state) that must be on a shared file system, or can each clustered host simply have these files locally? What must be

...e it attempts to take the recovery lock. It should never be able to do this because the lock should already be held by another process on the master/leader node. I've documented a couple of reasons, unrelated to the recovery lock, why CTDB can behave badly: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Basic_CTDB_configuration#Troubleshooting So, 2 questions: * Does the 2nd node still get banned if you disable the recovery lock? If not then the problem is clearly with the recovery lock. * What do the logs say about the reason for banning the node? peace & happiness, martin

Hello all, Thanks for the input. I opened up the firewall ports and testing connectivity by ctdb's ping to no avail. I did however fix the problem. I must have missed the section of the guide outlining the importance of the nodes file, but it seems the issue was that machine A's nodes file was in reverse order compared to B's. After rectifying that the cluster came up without issue,

...ock. It should never be able to do this > because the lock should already be held by another process on the > master/leader node. > > I've documented a couple of reasons, unrelated to the recovery lock, > why CTDB can behave badly: > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Basic_CTDB_configuration#Troubleshooting > > So, 2 questions: > > * Does the 2nd node still get banned if you disable the recovery lock? > > If not then the problem is clearly with the recovery lock. > > * What do the logs say about the reason for banning the node? > > peace & happi...